Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Feneant2
I thought it was retarded. The guy was unhappy with mommy and daddy so ran from all his problems. Great motivator for all the youngsters out there- Don't face your problems, just run away as far as you can.
Wow, way to simultaneously miss all nuance and detail, while also making wildly terrible interpretations of supposed morals (motivator?).
My take : Chris McCandless was a gifted student, very bright, but socially awkward. He almost certainly had some mental health issues that seemed to fuel his general dissatisfaction with his life. He had issues with his childhood, but that didn't seem to be the motivator for him to leave. He had larger issues with society in general, and being tossed into a mold where everyone is basically the same as everyone else (in his eyes), as well as attachment to property/wealth (the things you own, end up owning you).
His character also grew over the course of the film, and if you'll notice, at the beginning he was very much into getting far away from everything, later in the film he had actually decided that 'happiness is only real when shared' (possibly paraphrasing there). So in a sense, that realization somewhat invalidated the origins of his journey, and simultaneously serves as a cautionary tale towards anyone who would carelessly follow in his footsteps.
In terms of our modern society values, Chris McCandless was a stubborn, tragic figure who lacked (or willfully ignored) basic common sense when making decisions. As an experiment in personal philosophy and adventure, he is something else entirely. He was pretty universally liked by the people who met him on his journey, and seemed to bear no ill will towards anyone.
If any kid watches this, and takes a simplistic message out of it that it's cool to run away into the wilderness to die, then they deserve to be that stupid. This film was anything but simplistic.