Your a fiarly funny guy. I might be witholding a great deal of knowledge and be more interested in stirring the pot vs providing you with answers.you figure that out on your own.
iow, trolling. If you are purposefully trying to play ignorant, you're doing a fine job of it.
Light is actually fiarly slow.its takes over 14 billion years to cross the known universe. Thats pretty damn slow. but reaction at a distance occurs instantly.
Already explained to you. And it's "action at a distance," not "reaction at a distance."
How do you know it is the fastest thing in the universe ? did it ever occur to you that just maybe something else is faster. Hmmm just maybe ? could this be the crux of our issues with resolving quantum mechanics "if it is correct in the first place" and atomic level up physics. when you assume a constant arbitrarily "like einstien did" you put a big giant fix in the middle of the math.
What if jackalopes had wings too? Ever consider that?
what creates waves in photon motion ?
It's a fundamental property of particles and our universe that just is. Drop a pebble in a pond and you get a wave motion. Sound travels in waves.
You're asking a question that's akin to wondering why water is wet. Answering that question is not fundamental to understanding or explaining water.
LOLZ. they aren't dumb questions. they are questions which adress our basic lack of understanding of the underlying layers of the universe.
The problem is that it implies a faulty assumption - that without knowing absolutely everything we can't understand anything at all or that our knowledge must be wrong.
ahh yes the gravity particle. Well do you find it odd that when you put more energy in you get more energetic particles comming out. Maybe what the data really says is.
If you put more energy in. Your get more energy out. But that would be far to obvious. the standard model has yet to resolve anything.
It's not the gravity particle. The Higgs boson allegedly mediates mass, not gravity.
As far as putting energy in, the energy is required because particles like the Higgs boson are massive. Particle physicists are essentially creating mass from energy. (You know, e=mc2) In order to create them a huge amount of energy must be used.
Space time. what a novel concept. for instance lets remove time.
now we are left with space. what is it ? What is it made of ? does it have mass. does it exist as energy ? Is it binary ? is it organized ?
Time is relatively speaking a human paradigm based on out own perecptions.
time is change over distance. nothing more.
time is a human perecption.
First off, you tend to ge bogged down in philosophical considerations and not actual scientific questions.
Secondly, there's no point in removing time from space unless you're trying to consider another universe that is not our own. Without it space would not exist in the first place because nothing would have ever expanded. Without time none of us would be here so it's NOT just some human paradigm. The only thing human about time is the word we ascribe to it.
