Interesting tidbit about 9/11...

[jonks]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

Your problem is that you somehow look at profits as evidence of inclusion (or masterminding!) of a conspiracy that would require a cast of hundreds to participate and then remain silent. Cast members include officials at the highest levels of govt, the airlines, the faa, the fbi, the investigating teams, bin laden, and Seven Jeans.

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
What is the risk of getting caught? Even talking about this subject gets you(me) labeled a loony. As far as I am concerned what little risk he had was easily mitigated.

!!!!

How many different groups reviewed the wreckage? How many people witnessed the attacks? How many would have to be involved at every level to pull this off? And you think an insurance agency would even BLINK at balking on a $7 Billion payout if it had evidence of fraud to spare "the country's" feelings? HAHAHA!

 

[LegendKiller]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
What is the risk of getting caught? Even talking about this subject gets you(me) labeled a loony. As far as I am concerned what little risk he had was easily mitigated.

Yeah, life in prison and instant death in general population, is "easily mitigated".

It must be nice to live in a world so detached from reality. Tell ya what, once you get done watching James Bond, let me know and I'll welcome you to reality.

 

[Gibsons]

Originally posted by: LegendKiller

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: LegendKiller

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
are you that naive? 100k would entice most people to do almost anything. 1 million and the sky is the limit.

I guess you've never gotten close to 100k.

Only a fool with think that bringing down 2 buildings, severely damaging a 3rd, and crashing 4 planes, killing over 3,000 and destroying hundreds of billions in equity wealth in the capital markets, is a "rational" decision by somebody trying to make a buck.

You're really stretching.

are you that naive to think that people don't give a shit if someone lives or dies? Hellooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo mcflyyyyyyy jesus christ dude. What world do you live in man? There are some really evil fucked up people in this world. Lots of them. They existed throughout history. They just don't place any value on human life and the only objective for them is money and power. What do you think war is about? What do you think about all the hundreds of corporations that have profited through wars and human death? Your really really out of touch to believe these types of people would even blink at the thought of this. They do not consider you or me people we are merely human cattle. Here for there exploitation and benefit. Nothing more nothing less.

I work in one of the most cutthroat industries in history, investment banking, and I think you're full of shit. I've seen a lot of crazy stuff in this industry, but to think that this was purely a scam about money, is absolutely intellectually bankrupt.

Besides, it'd require secrecy on a level never seen before. Do you think the government, or any private individual, could keep that up? Hell, the government can't even keep special forces operations secret most of the time. Private industries are just as bad.

Not to mention blowjobs.

 

[darkswordsman17]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

In summary, Silverstein retains rights for Towers Two, Three, and Four. The Freedom Tower (designated as Tower One) will be owned by the Port Authority as well as Tower Five which may be leased out to another private developer and redesigned as a residential building.

There's a big gaping hole in your reasoning right there. He doesn't have rights to the Freedom Tower, so he's not banking the money from the leasing. He is putting up money from the insurance claims towards developing it though. What sick, twisted, greedy bastard he must be.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

Your problem is that you somehow look at profits as evidence of inclusion (or masterminding!) of a conspiracy that would require a cast of hundreds to participate and then remain silent. Cast members include officials at the highest levels of govt, the airlines, the faa, the fbi, the investigating teams, bin laden, and Seven Jeans.

Explain why this would require a cast of hundreds? The official story is that this was pulled off with less than 12 men of middle eastern decent!!!! One way or another this was "masterminded" why is it acceptable to be masterminded by 12 middle eastern men with a couple hundred thousand dollars but it would require a billionaire 100's of cast members?

 

[jonks]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

Your problem is that you somehow look at profits as evidence of inclusion (or masterminding!) of a conspiracy that would require a cast of hundreds to participate and then remain silent. Cast members include officials at the highest levels of govt, the airlines, the faa, the fbi, the investigating teams, bin laden, and Seven Jeans.

Explain why this would require a cast of hundreds? The official story is that this was pulled off with less than 12 men of middle eastern decent!!!! One way or another this was "masterminded" why is it acceptable to be masterminded by 12 middle eastern men with a couple hundred thousand dollars but it would require a billionaire 100's of cast members?

No no no, you don't get to only buy into the parts of the conspiracy you like and disregard the rest. If you buy that he planned/executed the twin towers, then he had to have pulled off the pentagon and Flight 93 attacks too. So, why do those also? To throw off the scent? Involving even more people unnecessarily?

The cast of 100s refers to 9/11 truthers who believe in the massive govt conspiracy/coverup/missile into the pentagon/controlled demolitions/execution of pentagon plane passengers/etc. Not that your Silverstein conspiracy is any more rational or based on anything other than wild speculation and coincidence than the basic 9/11 truther mantra.

 

[LegendKiller]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

Your problem is that you somehow look at profits as evidence of inclusion (or masterminding!) of a conspiracy that would require a cast of hundreds to participate and then remain silent. Cast members include officials at the highest levels of govt, the airlines, the faa, the fbi, the investigating teams, bin laden, and Seven Jeans.

Explain why this would require a cast of hundreds? The official story is that this was pulled off with less than 12 men of middle eastern decent!!!! One way or another this was "masterminded" why is it acceptable to be masterminded by 12 middle eastern men with a couple hundred thousand dollars but it would require a billionaire 100's of cast members?

12 men plus AQ who planned and prepared the operation. Excluding that part alone is missing the entire point.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: darkswordsman17

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

In summary, Silverstein retains rights for Towers Two, Three, and Four. The Freedom Tower (designated as Tower One) will be owned by the Port Authority as well as Tower Five which may be leased out to another private developer and redesigned as a residential building.

There's a big gaping hole in your reasoning right there. He doesn't have rights to the Freedom Tower, so he's not banking the money from the leasing. He is putting up money from the insurance claims towards developing it though. What sick, twisted, greedy bastard he must be.

Dude.......port authority has always owned the building. Silverstein still retains the lease which was for 99 years........not sure what you don't get about that.

 

[geno]

Originally posted by: CasioTech
obviously that's not going to happen because our army is a joke. But in the grand scheme of things, we'll get rich off this war, may not happen for a long time though.

Think a second about how the US, hell, any country's economy works. How are we making money? Are other countries PAYING us billions of dollars to occupy Iraq? I thought not. So, genius, where is the money coming from? Where are the billions, or as you claim trillions, coming from? We're stimulating certain areas of our economy, potentially draining others. I'm DYING to know where you think trillions of dollars is coming from. The Middle East? Are they paying us to pay them for their oil? Please, do tell and provide proof. Otherwise, you're a trolling fake who's doing nothing more than hitting a bees nest with a stick.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: LegendKiller

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

Your problem is that you somehow look at profits as evidence of inclusion (or masterminding!) of a conspiracy that would require a cast of hundreds to participate and then remain silent. Cast members include officials at the highest levels of govt, the airlines, the faa, the fbi, the investigating teams, bin laden, and Seven Jeans.

Explain why this would require a cast of hundreds? The official story is that this was pulled off with less than 12 men of middle eastern decent!!!! One way or another this was "masterminded" why is it acceptable to be masterminded by 12 middle eastern men with a couple hundred thousand dollars but it would require a billionaire 100's of cast members?

12 men plus AQ who planned and prepared the operation. Excluding that part alone is missing the entire point.

Again what makes you think 100's were involved. See the whole thing with security is the more people involved the harder it is to remain secure. This is why top secret security and above is HIGHLY compartmentalized.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Wasn't the whole "he collected insurance money from 9/11" thing disproven yesterday IBS?

Still, it makes perfect sense that a guy worth billions would blow up several buildings and kill thousands including personal friends just to make some more money. I mean, rich people will do anything.

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Not to mention you took this from Wikipedia where all your conspiracy brothers like to post information that has NO credibility.

check the sources yoruself dude. Disprove those facts please. If you are going to challenge the numbers do it. Show how my calculations are off please. Show me how this isn't netting him 10's of billions of dollars. please please show me how.

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

It's like when you get flooded and it costs $27 to fix the popcorn ceiling, an insurance company will give you $2k.

It's like that but on a much larger scale.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: LegendKiller

How much will it take for you, Arcadio, Casio, and Alkemyst to leave the boards forever?

I'll sell my account for $2000 obo.

PM with offers.

 

[BeauJangles]

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: LegendKiller

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you disprove the figures and profits I have presented. Furthermore, the insurance companies did fight the payout. The full amount for 2 attacks would have totaled 7 billion the judgment was capped at 4.5 billion liability as determined by the value of the towers. And even furthermore, no company in their right mind is going to go against the status quo in the face of a undeniable evidence that it was a terrorist attack during a time of disaster and mourning. Can you imagine the PR fallout if that happened....it would be suicide. It was a terrorist attack only the terrorists weren't all caught and aren't all who we think they are.

Your problem is that you somehow look at profits as evidence of inclusion (or masterminding!) of a conspiracy that would require a cast of hundreds to participate and then remain silent. Cast members include officials at the highest levels of govt, the airlines, the faa, the fbi, the investigating teams, bin laden, and Seven Jeans.

Explain why this would require a cast of hundreds? The official story is that this was pulled off with less than 12 men of middle eastern decent!!!! One way or another this was "masterminded" why is it acceptable to be masterminded by 12 middle eastern men with a couple hundred thousand dollars but it would require a billionaire 100's of cast members?

12 men plus AQ who planned and prepared the operation. Excluding that part alone is missing the entire point.

Again what makes you think 100's were involved. See the whole thing with security is the more people involved the harder it is to remain secure. This is why top secret security and above is HIGHLY compartmentalized.

So if Arab men did not act alone in taking down the WTC, what exactly happened? Conspiracy theorists never have just one theory, they have a million bits and pieces. First it's "bombs in the buildings," then it's "weapons pods" on the planes, then it's "the planes were swapped with planes full of high explosives," then it's "missiles."

Which is it this time and who exactly is involved?

 

[ric1287]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Wasn't the whole "he collected insurance money from 9/11" thing disproven yesterday IBS?

Still, it makes perfect sense that a guy worth billions would blow up several buildings and kill thousands including personal friends just to make some more money. I mean, rich people will do anything.

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

Which still...proves absolutely nothing other than people need thinking this shit up need some hobbies.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: geno

Originally posted by: CasioTech
obviously that's not going to happen because our army is a joke. But in the grand scheme of things, we'll get rich off this war, may not happen for a long time though.

Think a second about how the US, hell, any country's economy works. How are we making money? Are other countries PAYING us billions of dollars to occupy Iraq? I thought not. So, genius, where is the money coming from? Where are the billions, or as you claim trillions, coming from? We're stimulating certain areas of our economy, potentially draining others. I'm DYING to know where you think trillions of dollars is coming from. The Middle East? Are they paying us to pay them for their oil? Please, do tell and provide proof. Otherwise, you're a trolling fake who's doing nothing more than hitting a bees nest with a stick.

he's confusing our government with global corporate conglomerates. They are easily confused though since they do own our govt........so cut him some slack.

 

[ric1287]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Not to mention you took this from Wikipedia where all your conspiracy brothers like to post information that has NO credibility.

check the sources yoruself dude. Disprove those facts please. If you are going to challenge the numbers do it. Show how my calculations are off please. Show me how this isn't netting him 10's of billions of dollars. please please show me how.

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

It's like when you get flooded and it costs $27 to fix the popcorn ceiling, an insurance company will give you $2k.

It's like that but on a much larger scale.

hahahaha, are you implying that insurance companies just pay out random amounts of money? Are you high? Have you ever dealt with an insurance company?

 

[grrl]

OMG, page 8 already! All aboard the Troller-coaster. Or is this the Trolly-go-round?

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: BeauJangles

So if Arab men did not act alone in taking down the WTC, what exactly happened? Conspiracy theorists never have just one theory, they have a million bits and pieces. First it's "bombs in the buildings," then it's "weapons pods" on the planes, then it's "the planes were swapped with planes full of high explosives," then it's "missiles."

Which is it this time and who exactly is involved?

I'm not sure all the players I know this isn't a VAST conspiracy...probably ridiculously simple really.

Supply extremist terrorist group with resources and assistance to accomplish their goals of making an attack on the US government. Don't tell them about your plan to profit from it.

Seems easy.

 

[Josh]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Not to mention you took this from Wikipedia where all your conspiracy brothers like to post information that has NO credibility.

check the sources yoruself dude. Disprove those facts please. If you are going to challenge the numbers do it. Show how my calculations are off please. Show me how this isn't netting him 10's of billions of dollars. please please show me how.

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

It's like when you get flooded and it costs $27 to fix the popcorn ceiling, an insurance company will give you $2k.

It's like that but on a much larger scale.

:roll: Now you can't honestly believe that. Insurance companies are the most scrupulous fuckers in the world.

Secondly, weren't you just saying that the government is the ones profiting off this whole debacle? Now it's Larry Silverstein? Make up your mind. You conspiracy theorists can't stick to one argument - it's always bouncing all over the place agreeing to every single thing your looney brothers and sisters say.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Not to mention you took this from Wikipedia where all your conspiracy brothers like to post information that has NO credibility.

check the sources yoruself dude. Disprove those facts please. If you are going to challenge the numbers do it. Show how my calculations are off please. Show me how this isn't netting him 10's of billions of dollars. please please show me how.

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

It's like when you get flooded and it costs $27 to fix the popcorn ceiling, an insurance company will give you $2k.

It's like that but on a much larger scale.

:roll: Now you can't honestly believe that. Insurance companies are the most scrupulous fuckers in the world.

Secondly, weren't you just saying that the government is the ones profiting off this whole debacle? Now it's Larry Silverstein? Make up your mind. You conspiracy theorists can't stick to one argument - it's always bouncing all over the place agreeing to every single thing your looney brothers and sisters say.

josh you should be off trying to refute my facts about the insane profits that are being reaped from this scam.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: geno

Originally posted by: CasioTech
obviously that's not going to happen because our army is a joke. But in the grand scheme of things, we'll get rich off this war, may not happen for a long time though.

Think a second about how the US, hell, any country's economy works. How are we making money? Are other countries PAYING us billions of dollars to occupy Iraq? I thought not. So, genius, where is the money coming from? Where are the billions, or as you claim trillions, coming from? We're stimulating certain areas of our economy, potentially draining others. I'm DYING to know where you think trillions of dollars is coming from. The Middle East? Are they paying us to pay them for their oil? Please, do tell and provide proof. Otherwise, you're a trolling fake who's doing nothing more than hitting a bees nest with a stick.

LOOOOOOOOL

Germany was forced, by the Treaty of Versailles, to pay 226 billion Reichsmarks, later reduced to something like 130 billion Reichsmarks, to Britain and France so they could pay back all of their financiers (including the United States).

After WWII, it was decided that Germany would pay back the US when it was unified again. Apparently it will all be paid back to the US by 2010.

so learn your history, stupid little boy, before calling me out.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted


hahahaha, are you implying that insurance companies just pay out random amounts of money? Are you high? Have you ever dealt with an insurance company?

yes... that example was my own.

 

[CasioTech]

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: CasioTech

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim

Originally posted by: Josh

Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Furthermore.........

As a private developer with a 99-year lease on 1WTC, 2WTC, 4WTC, and 5WTC, Silverstein insured the buildings. The insurance policies on these four buildings were underwritten by 24 insurance companies for a combined total of $3.55 billion in property damage coverage.

Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.

Even after 10 years of rebuilding time @ 102 million per year that is only 1 billion and change being paid out of the 3.5 billion insurance settlement.

-Silverstein nets 2+ billion from the insurance deal
-He avoids paying to update the aging towers
-He doesn't pay anything to rebuild the towers
-he collects 1 billion per month in rent once the towers are done.

win win win win win win win win

Sorry I refuse to believe this is the luckiest guy in history of the world. He is as dirty as they come.

Not to mention you took this from Wikipedia where all your conspiracy brothers like to post information that has NO credibility.

check the sources yoruself dude. Disprove those facts please. If you are going to challenge the numbers do it. Show how my calculations are off please. Show me how this isn't netting him 10's of billions of dollars. please please show me how.

of course he made off with billions, that's what happens when insurance pays you out.

It's like when you get flooded and it costs $27 to fix the popcorn ceiling, an insurance company will give you $2k.

It's like that but on a much larger scale.

:roll: Now you can't honestly believe that. Insurance companies are the most scrupulous fuckers in the world.

Secondly, weren't you just saying that the government is the ones profiting off this whole debacle? Now it's Larry Silverstein? Make up your mind. You conspiracy theorists can't stick to one argument - it's always bouncing all over the place agreeing to every single thing your looney brothers and sisters say.

NO, I dont' agree that this guy did it, I am simply saying that he happened to make a shitload off of other peoples' misfortunes.

 

[Ns1]

Originally posted by: CasioTech

:thumbsup:

that's right, rich people like the Rockefeller's will kill any amount of people to make more money for themselves and their shitty own families.

then they will donate a million dollars and spend 10 million advertising it.

hey, what's technology again?

I missed the post where you explained that to us.