Lonbjerg
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 4,419
- 0
- 0
That list tells nothing of what was claimed.
Can you list me the developers that always have used havok (and have the experine tools in house) and the ones not using PhysX because they think it's worthless?
No?
Then the list is worthless.
You participated in that thread. I don't care if you ignore me. Not trying to please anyone. Not my fault you can't remember what you talked about earlier this month.
Lying won't help you.
Here is another one:
"PhysX is proparitary and that is bad!!!"
So is Havok.
So is X86.
So what?!
But I find it strange that all those that "despise" PhysX can't present argumentation based on facts, but only can regurgitate the same false, uniformed statments/lies.
Makes you wonder about the dislike of PhysX is not based on facts, but brand preferences.
Even DKanter didn't bash PhysX with facts, but false (and now disproven) assumptions.
One way we will find out is how certain pster will talk about Bullet...if AMD ever gets something out the door...ah well.
