Double Trouble
Elite Member
- Oct 9, 1999
- 9,270
- 103
- 106
Ditto that..... there will be major suits flying on that one as soon as an innocent third party (at one point or another, just a matter of time) sees their image or address listed.
Probably true, but it's pretty goddamn funny for the time being.Originally posted by: rahvin
Now wouldn't it be interesting if someone found out where they worked and pretended to be someone else. Say a prominent politician. Once they post all the fun personal details of said politician and the onslaught begins I would say the person that owns that site is going to be liable for some SERIOUS damages.
Originally posted by: luvly
I suspect the site in question is going to be subjected to a civil lawsuit soon for defamation. It looks tacky to begin with (i.e., such a messy site). Additionally, a genuine site interested in the welfare of the true victims would make effort to stay in contact with law enforcement and a network of organisations, it seems to me. It seems like this is a profit intended business that forgot to consult for legal advice before starting the business. It's still fresh and hasn't yet circulated well enough. Once it has circulated, the suit will take effect. I just noted: Not even copyright information or year the site began.
Also, I imagine people, as it gets more popular, playing pranks on other people in real life by giving someone else's phone number or address. Anything goes on the 'net. Until someone actually endeavours to meet another party in real life or actually gives the other party a phone call, I refuse to accuse someone of an action, as a wannabe, or having intent. I would have no problem if they published the chats and e-mail addresses but not the phone numbers or addresses given.
This is my opinion, again, so don't get personal with me. Stay in topic, as I haven't gotten personal with anyone.
I do not claim to be a legal counsel. The views expressed are simply my opinion and thoughts.
Originally posted by: luvly
"How do you think its a profit oriented site?"
Check this out: "A. Currently our answer is to send it to your favorite child protection organization. I also recommend any anti-child abuse organization, missing children organization, anti-animal abuse organization or battered women's shelter. We're working on putting together a T-Shirt (Like every other site seems to do) for people to buy in the future. Check the How to Support page for things you can do to help our goals."
Although they pretend to be for the real organisations out there by claiming people should donate money to an organisation, they haven't hesitated to state their future plan to make a T-Shirt. Have they stated that their proceeds from the sale of the t-shirts would be donated to non-profit organisations? No.
Originally posted by: luvly
"How do you think its a profit oriented site?"
Check this out: "A. Currently our answer is to send it to your favorite child protection organization. I also recommend any anti-child abuse organization, missing children organization, anti-animal abuse organization or battered women's shelter. We're working on putting together a T-Shirt (Like every other site seems to do) for people to buy in the future. Check the How to Support page for things you can do to help our goals."
Although they pretend to be for the real organisations out there by claiming people should donate money to an organisation, they haven't hesitated to state their future plan to make a T-Shirt. Have they stated that their proceeds from the sale of the t-shirts would be donated to non-profit organisations? No.
Playing the "send to a child protection organization" sounds like a public relations effort to prove and establish that they have good intent. It sounds to me like they just started the site, so they are trying to organise their business money making plans and have intent to bring it out in the future. It wouldn't be hard to say, "We got advertisers so we could afford to maintain the site." Maybe they're just having trouble finding a true business that isn't concerned about losing money by sponsoring/associating itself with the questionable site.
