Originally posted by: tcsenter
Well, there is a moderate approach to which GWB and Ashcroft have given lip service, and that approach goes something like this:
"While the Federal Constitution's Second Amendment vigorously protects the individual's right to keep and bear arms, it does not pose a barrier to 'reasonable' regulation or restriction, just as all constitutional rights are subject to reasonable regulation and restriction."
The assault weapons ban of 1994 can then be said to be a 'reasonable' restriction of the individual's Second Amendment's rights, along with background checks. The point of contention then becomes what constitutes "reasonable".
Here are several more interesting articles and editorials:
An ineffective 'assault weapons' ban deserves to expire by Robert J. Caldwell, San Diego Union-Tribune
Debate rekindled on assault-weapon ban by Dana Wilkie, San Diego Union-Tribue
Backfire: Democrats discover that gun control doesn't win elections Wall Street Journal Editorial
Dead on arrival by Debra J. Saunders, San Francisco Chronicle
CNN rapped over gun segment by Robert Stacey McCain, Washington Times