<< Christians who use violence in the name of God to destroy their enemies have no justification for their actions from Jesus Christ, his life and teachings as found in the New Testament. Whereas, Muslims who are engaged in violence and destruction of anyone who opposes Islam, have ample justification for their actions from the Qur'an and the life and sayings of prophet Muhammad. >>
Assuming I understand this correctly, they are condemning violent Christians while defending violent Muslims? The rest of the article seems like jiberish, much like any religious attempt to invoke science in its argument.