interesting article: Bush didn't squander the world's sympathy - he spent it

[glenn1]

good read from the Atlantic Monthly

 

[etech]

Yes it was a good read and matches much of what I believe is happening. I don't think you will get much response on this article though. It isn't bashing Pres. Bush.

 

[Insane3D]

Originally posted by: etech
Yes it was a good read and matches much of what I believe is happening. I don't think you will get much response on this article though. It isn't bashing Pres. Bush.

Nah, there is plenty of the "Bush can do no wrong and is the greatest President ever" crowd that will give it plenty of attention.

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: Insane3D

Originally posted by: etech
Yes it was a good read and matches much of what I believe is happening. I don't think you will get much response on this article though. It isn't bashing Pres. Bush.

Nah, there is plenty of the "Bush can do no wrong and is the greatest President ever" crowd that will give it plenty of attention.

You can ignore the entire article and still get a bash in. You are good at what you do.


Why not comment on the article? You did bother to read it didn't you?

 

[Dari]

good article. as it (somewhat) mentioned, arab solidarity and strength is nothing more than an ethereal phantom: a pervasive aura but lacking in solidity. If I didn't know better, I'd bet that arabs living under the wings of other anachronistic regimes are wishing that American troops would implement regime change in their capitals as well.

 

[Insane3D]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Insane3D

Originally posted by: etech
Yes it was a good read and matches much of what I believe is happening. I don't think you will get much response on this article though. It isn't bashing Pres. Bush.

Nah, there is plenty of the "Bush can do no wrong and is the greatest President ever" crowd that will give it plenty of attention.

You can ignore the entire article and still get a bash in. You are good at what you do.


Why not comment on the article? You did bother to read it didn't you?

It was actually a very good article, and yes, I did read it. Please pray tell how I "ignored the entire article" and "still got a bash in"? I don't see anything in my post that could be construed as a "bash" on Bush. I was just countering your cynical remark with an equally cynical remark. Are you the only one that can post in that style?