Interesting anecdotal article about vaccination

[v-600]

Yay vaccination, told y'all it was good for you. That and the fact that people that study these things in detail already told us this.

http://www.mamamia.com.au/social/vaccination-growing-up-unvaccinated/

Fuel....meet fire....

 

[First]

Vaccine-deniers put everyone at risk. These turds are truly reckless individuals. Vaccines are common sense, tried and true, and whether deniers know it or not is irrelevant to reality.

Not that this anecdote itself is proof vaccines are good for people, as that is more than obvious from the science and statistics on vaccines.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

I find water at 50c to be wet

 

[Oyeve]

I am for most vaccines, I am not for the flu shot. The flu will kill humanity once the ultra-superflu hits.

 

[Moonbeam]

I find water at 50c to be wet

But it's only half as wet as water that costs a dollar.

 

[Rakehellion]

I stopped reading at "anecdotal."

 

[thraashman]

I am for most vaccines, I am not for the flu shot. The flu will kill humanity once the ultra-superflu hits.

I fully intend to follow Randall Flagg.

 

[thraashman]

I stopped reading at "anecdotal."

Well the whole point of the article is that science completely supports vaccination and that the ONLY evidence the anti-vaccine crowd has is anecdotal, so the writer is giving the other side of anecdotal.

 

[silverpig]

I fully intend to follow Randall Flagg.

M-O-O-N.

 

[Anarchist420]

i have noticed that a lot of the anti-vaccination folks are pretty damn incredible, but that doesnt mean that the State and its pharmaceutical industrial complex care about us. the truth lies somewhere in between on this matter... it really does.

but i am against ALL DSM labels like asperger's, schizophrenia, bipolar tourettes, adhd, add, etc., etc because it is your ability that shows what can and can't be expected of you and that's what really matters. if it helps, perhaps a person can be tested for being potentially violent and labeled either not potentially violent or potentially violent and maybe the risk factors/triggers whatever if any particular ones can be known. and the other thing is whether you are at risk for being a victim, in what way, and by whom (people diagnosed with asperger's are often victims, but seldom perpetrators of violence). those are really the only three things necessary that my puny imagination can come up with because we are over medicated and over diagnosed with shit that makes no difference in and of itself while being taxed to pay for it all.

 

[werepossum]

i have noticed that a lot of the anti-vaccination folks are pretty damn incredible, but that doesnt mean that the State and its pharmaceutical industrial complex care about us. the truth lies somewhere in between on this matter... it really does.

but i am against ALL DSM labels like asperger's, schizophrenia, bipolar tourettes, adhd, add, etc., etc because it is your ability that shows what can and can't be expected of you and that's what really matters. if it helps, perhaps a person can be tested for being potentially violent and labeled either not potentially violent or potentially violent and maybe the risk factors/triggers whatever if any particular ones can be known. and the other thing is whether you are at risk for being a victim, in what way, and by whom (people diagnosed with asperger's are often victims, but seldom perpetrators of violence). those are really the only three things necessary that my puny imagination can come up with because we are over medicated and over diagnosed with shit that makes no difference in and of itself while being taxed to pay for it all.

I agree that such labels are often arbitrary shackles. I know a guy who makes buttloads of money as a nuclear chemist, good enough to be sent around the globe, who has Asperger's. Even when the diagnosis is accurate, it does not define the person. However, actions and attitudes caused by the diagnosis can define the person - unless the person has a lot of determination.

I did lol at vaccine injuries being rampant. Sort of like zombie bites being rampant.

 

[Anarchist420]

I agree that such labels are often arbitrary shackles.

they do more harm than good imo.

 

[Pray To Jesus]

i have noticed that a lot of the anti-vaccination folks are pretty damn incredible, but that doesnt mean that the State and its pharmaceutical industrial complex care about us. the truth lies somewhere in between on this matter... it really does.

but i am against ALL DSM labels like asperger's, schizophrenia, bipolar tourettes, adhd, add, etc., etc because it is your ability that shows what can and can't be expected of you and that's what really matters. if it helps, perhaps a person can be tested for being potentially violent and labeled either not potentially violent or potentially violent and maybe the risk factors/triggers whatever if any particular ones can be known. and the other thing is whether you are at risk for being a victim, in what way, and by whom (people diagnosed with asperger's are often victims, but seldom perpetrators of violence). those are really the only three things necessary that my puny imagination can come up with because we are over medicated and over diagnosed with shit that makes no difference in and of itself while being taxed to pay for it all.

Took your meds yet?