Intel SU2300 vs SU4100, much difference?

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Maximilian, Oct 18, 2009.

  1. Maximilian

    Maximilian Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,579
    Likes Received:
    5
    SU2300 - Dual core celeron
    1.2ghz
    1mb cache
    800mhz FSB

    SU4100 - Dual core pentium
    1.3ghz
    2mb cache
    800mhz FSB

    Is the core architecture cache sensitive? will that 1mb of cache make a big difference between these two cpu's?
     
  2. drizek

    drizek Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whether it is worth it really depends on the price difference. Neither one is going to be fast, but both will be adequate for a number of tasks.
     
  3. cusideabelincoln

    cusideabelincoln Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. drizek

    drizek Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    But that is at 2.2ghz. These are nearly half that speed, so the difference should be less pronounced.

    Personally, I think it is worth waiting for Arrandale and getting these things with Turbo mode.
     
  5. Ben90

    Ben90 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,866
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  6. cusideabelincoln

    cusideabelincoln Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    0
    The % differences would be comparable, neither any more nor any less pronounced.

    The fact both of those chips run at 2.2 GHz is to equivocate as much as possible. They are basically the same exact chip, except one has half the cache. Likewise the SU2300 and S4100 are similar chips, with the major difference being one having half the cache. But in this case, the chip with more cache also has a higher clock speed, and thus this will add to its performance advantage.
     
  7. drizek

    drizek Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, the percent difference would be less, because cache is not as limiting at 1.2ghz. You can also look at it the other way, where people who bought 2mb cache chips and overclocked them to 3ghz+ were getting much worse performance/clock than E6000 series, despite having similar performance/clock in the 2ghz range.
     
  8. firewolfsm

    firewolfsm Golden Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,800
    Likes Received:
    0
    That shouldn't be true, as cpus are overclocked, so is L2 cache, removing that bottleneck to an extent. You could be right but I'm almost certain cache differences produce a repeatable percent difference between processors at different speeds.
     
  9. Ben90

    Ben90 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,866
    Likes Received:
    0
    +1

    A $miss @ 1 mhz doesnt really matter, the ram has ur information already.
    A $miss @ 5 ghz matters a lot more, u gotta wait for many more clock cycles to get the info
     
  10. Maximilian

    Maximilian Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,579
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ah that looks fine, they both perform well enough given their specs. Just wanted to make sure i avoid any crippled cpu's like that old P4 celeron with 128kb cache.
     
  11. drizek

    drizek Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    So what laptop are you thinking of buying?
     
  12. Maximilian

    Maximilian Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,579
    Likes Received:
    5
    Im not sure, i want a netbook, but one with more power. As far as im concerned anything 11.6" or under is a netbook to me so im looking at the acer 1810tz and the hp pavilion dm1, both can be pre ordered here in the UK.