Revenue down 7%, which is actually better than their forecast. Stock getting pummeled anyway.
Client was the big loser. "Datacenter and AI" posted higher revenue but lower net income. That's terrible.
Hm, very likely Manuel from FT.But look at this quote from I think the same Toms Hardware article:
Unfortunately, we don't have any official benchmark results of AMD's new Threadripper 5000WX Pro CPUs and AMD's server CPUs such as Milan and Milan-X to compare against. However, if AMD's 3990X results tell us anything, it's that Sapphire Rapids can offer incredible performance over AMD's Zen 2 counterparts, which should provide some good competition against Zen 3 Threadripper and EPYC processors.
So it just beats Zen2, and they think it will compete with Zen 4 ? Who writes this crap ?
Well sorry but... this typical Tom's.But look at this quote from I think the same Toms Hardware article:
Unfortunately, we don't have any official benchmark results of AMD's new Threadripper 5000WX Pro CPUs and AMD's server CPUs such as Milan and Milan-X to compare against. However, if AMD's 3990X results tell us anything, it's that Sapphire Rapids can offer incredible performance over AMD's Zen 2 counterparts, which should provide some good competition against Zen 3 Threadripper and EPYC processors.
So it just beats Zen2, and they think it will compete with Zen 4 ? Who writes this crap ?
They say it'll compete with Zen 3. It's in the quote...But look at this quote from I think the same Toms Hardware article:
Unfortunately, we don't have any official benchmark results of AMD's new Threadripper 5000WX Pro CPUs and AMD's server CPUs such as Milan and Milan-X to compare against. However, if AMD's 3990X results tell us anything, it's that Sapphire Rapids can offer incredible performance over AMD's Zen 2 counterparts, which should provide some good competition against Zen 3 Threadripper and EPYC processors.
So it just beats Zen2, and they think it will compete with Zen 4 ? Who writes this crap ?
And Zen 3 has been out for now long ? My 5950x's are dated 2018 mfg date, and I bought them in 2020. So maybe it will compete with Zen 3, but what about Milan (thats been out that long) and Genoa (that will be out before SR comes out) or Bergamo that will be out shortly after. It should compete against something released within 6 months either way from it.They say it'll compete with Zen 3. It's in the quote...
None of that has anything to do with you claiming they were talking about Zen 4. And Zen 3 Threadrippers are quite new, on that particular topic.And Zen 3 has been out for now long ? My 5950x's are dated 2018 mfg date, and I bought them in 2020. So maybe it will compete with Zen 3, but what about Milan (thats been out that long) and Genoa (that will be out before SR comes out) or Bergamo that will be out shortly after. It should compete against something released within 6 months either way from it.
Tom's Hardware has been consistently delivering quality journalism.But look at this quote from I think the same Toms Hardware article:
Unfortunately, we don't have any official benchmark results of AMD's new Threadripper 5000WX Pro CPUs and AMD's server CPUs such as Milan and Milan-X to compare against. However, if AMD's 3990X results tell us anything, it's that Sapphire Rapids can offer incredible performance over AMD's Zen 2 counterparts, which should provide some good competition against Zen 3 Threadripper and EPYC processors.
So it just beats Zen2, and they think it will compete with Zen 4 ? Who writes this crap ?
I did not say they said anything about Zen 4. But any idiot knows that to compare to a technology that is 3-4 years old (Zen 3) is insane in this day and age. I assumed incorrectly that they meant Zen 4 or Genoa, since thats what will be out about the time they are announced. This article said nothing of the configurations, or the power usage, just a couple quick benchmarks, that by themselves mean very little. But as Thibsie said, Intels $$$ in their pockets mean more than real journalism.None of that has anything to do with you claiming they were talking about Zen 4. And Zen 3 Threadrippers are quite new, on that particular topic.
Mfg date on the CPU is in year/week format. I checked a few reviews from launch day and almost all had week 38(mid Sep) 5950Xs, a couple week 35(late Aug). I bet your 5950X's are 2038's too, week 18 is too early.And Zen 3 has been out for now long ? My 5950x's are dated 2018 mfg date, and I bought them in 2020. So maybe it will compete with Zen 3, but what about Milan (thats been out that long) and Genoa (that will be out before SR comes out) or Bergamo that will be out shortly after. It should compete against something released within 6 months either way from it.
I meant year 2018, and yes, LATE.... They came out in late 2020, but they were manufactured before that. 2018 may be too early, I just thought I remembered seeing that.Mfg date on the CPU is in year/week format. I checked a few reviews from launch day and almost all had week 38(mid Sep) 5950Xs, a couple week 35(late Aug). I bet your 5950X's are 2038's too, week 18 is too early.
Uh...I did not say they said anything about Zen 4.
So it just beats Zen2, and they think it will compete with Zen 4 ? Who writes this crap ?
They stated exactly what they meant. Chagall is not even 2 months old. Why are you expecting a replacement any time soon?I assumed incorrectly that they meant Zen 4 or Genoa
Indeed, that's what the leak consists of... If you have other information, by all means post it.This article said nothing of the configurations, or the power usage, just a couple quick benchmarks
Since you don't get my point, lets try this. The 8470 should be compared to a EPYC CPU that is due out at the same time. a SERVER CPU. apples to apples. By the best guesses I have seen, that will be Genoa. So a 48 core or 64 core Genoa against the 56 core 8470. I predict it will lose BADLY. And power consumption as well. I believe that's what @nicalandia is also saying.Uh...
They stated exactly what they meant. Chagall is not even 2 months old. Why are you expecting a replacement any time soon?
Indeed, that's what the leak consists of... If you have other information, by all means post it.
I agree. Genoa will obviously slaughter Sapphire Rapids, and I don't see a single person claiming otherwise. But that has nothing to do with the part of your comment I replied to.The 8470 should be compared to a EPYC CPU that is due out at the same time. a SERVER CPU
That link doesn't seem to be working anymore.
Revenue down 7%, which is actually better than their forecast. Stock getting pummeled anyway.
Client was the big loser. "Datacenter and AI" posted higher revenue but lower net income. That's terrible.
I can only guess that Intel doesn't have Alder Lake in sufficient quantity to offset the losses in client. DCG while losing margin fast seems to be a more stable bubble overall so Intel likely moved older node capacity to there which would explain expanding revenue (with stagnating profit).But it is surprising to me that it's client that's really taking a beating, despite Alder Lake being essentially the most sophisticated CPU product they can bring to market. AND they have at least one followup before manufacturing woes threaten their roadmap again. The DCG numbers are not inspirational, but they're still better than client.
Sapphire is also 1600 mm2...Skimming the earnings call transcript, Intel is saying increased revenue in second half of the year partially attributed to data center product ramps of both Icelake and Sapphire Rapids. They also continue to put partial blame on decreasing margins due to 10nm/7 ramping. Seems they still haven't got all the yield issues resolved for 10nm/7, not to the point of enabling the larger dies without issue anyway.
It's 4 x 400 mm2 tiles with each tile already having 1 core disabled for yield. Icelake is even bigger at over 600 mm2 but only a single die. That's why I mentioned the larger dies still clearly being an issue. I don't think this should be surprising to anyone, just that it is almost confirmation from Intel without directly saying it.Sapphire is also 1600 mm2...
4x400 still means they are using 1600 mm2 of 10 nm silicon, even if the yields of each individual chiplet is better than Icelake XCC.It's 4 x 400 mm2 tiles with each tile already having 1 core disabled for yield. Icelake is even bigger at over 600 mm2 but only a single die. That's why I mentioned the larger dies still clearly being an issue. I don't think this should be surprising to anyone, just that it is almost confirmation from Intel without directly saying it.
What is your point in relation to my post?4x400 still means they are using 1600 mm2 of 10 nm silicon, even if the yields of each individual chiplet is better than Icelake XCC.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
B | Question Intel I7 10700 Thermal Throttling Possibly with Arctic Freezer 7X | CPUs and Overclocking | 10 | |
L | Question Best CPU integrated graphics: Intel or AMD? | CPUs and Overclocking | 33 | |
J | Question Intel Q4 Results | CPUs and Overclocking | 256 | |
J | Question Intel Q3 Results | CPUs and Overclocking | 81 | |
J | Question Intel Q2 Results - Terrible | CPUs and Overclocking | 215 |