Intel Pentium-M processors

HyTekJosh

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,500
0
0
Does anyone know if Intel plans on releasing any new P-M processors within the near future? I heard that the P-M is just around the corner. Does anyone have an expected release date for this? What about comparisons of the P-M 1.7GHz versus the P-M 1.8GHz?

Thank you.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
I heard something about this Monday for the 'Dothan' Pentium-M chips. Soon enough all of intel's desktop CPUs will be based on the Pentium-M, as they abandoned the P4 platform.
 

HyTekJosh

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,500
0
0
I wonder how long it will take Dell to get the 1.8 P-M into their notebooks. I need to order a new notebook soon.
 

AWhackWhiteBoy

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2004
1,807
0
0
yes, the Dothan is right around the coner but they make a fair amount of extra heat so most of the exsisting laptop designs first have to be revamped to handle the extra heat.
 

Soulkeeper

Diamond Member
Nov 23, 2001
6,732
155
106
i hear their next dual core cpu will be based of of the centrino Pm work
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Originally posted by: Wahsapa
its a very interesting cpu to get excited over

Especially since the Pentium M is more Athlon-like than the Pentium 4 is/was :D

*EDIT* Sorry... I don't mean to be AMD fanboyish... I just find it a little amusing that everyone who was excited about 5 Ghz Pentium 4's based on the Prescott core will have to settle for something closer to 2 Ghz with model numbers :) I also find it amusing that Intel, the king of "bigger is better," is now following AMD's footsteps in looking for more efficient processors.
One could argue that Intel knew this would happen all along, and the first Pentium M's were basically Intel testing the market with these lower clocked, but more efficient processors... and Intel realized there would be a need for parallel processing, and brought Hyper-Threading to the desktop in preparation for dual core CPU's. And all that might be true... they may have anticipated the need for both of those things and started to familiarize themselves with it, and prepare the market for it... but it sounds to me like they were caught with their pants down and their dingy in their hands seeing as how they scrapped the Prescott and Tejas (according to what I've read) which were supposed to be wonderful cores.

I'm trying to think... when was the last time CPU's took about a 30% decrease in speed in favor of efficiency?