Intel Penryn
- Thread starter Intelia
- Start date
funny that I was see you both in this one....Intelia I can stand, the jackarse I cant...
I like this...
Moldavian term for moldy Apple
I knew Intel would eventually right the ship...if it is all it is cracked up to be, I will be there buying it....
As for the stupid fvckers who cant setup a PC...cough....fatty4KU....cough...it wont matter you wont be smart enough to run it...
Edit:
change your avatar if you want you are still the same idiot....
As if AMD dont have anything in development and are hoping an x2 in 3 years will still be enough to have the performance crown..
This Intel come back isnt the second coming of christ.
This Intel come back isnt the second coming of christ.
Some things to remember...
1. AMD and IBM have already produced lab (hand tooled) versions of the 45nm as well at East Fishkill...they are also working on the 22nm versions.
2. The Penryn won't be until ~2008.
3. AMD is shipping their quad cores at the beginning of 2007
We really don't know how things will play out for either company that far out (remember that 3 years ago, Intel predicted 10 GHz air-cooled Netburst chips for 2006...).
Either way, it's gonna be a fun decade!
1. AMD and IBM have already produced lab (hand tooled) versions of the 45nm as well at East Fishkill...they are also working on the 22nm versions.
2. The Penryn won't be until ~2008.
3. AMD is shipping their quad cores at the beginning of 2007
We really don't know how things will play out for either company that far out (remember that 3 years ago, Intel predicted 10 GHz air-cooled Netburst chips for 2006...).
Either way, it's gonna be a fun decade!
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
- May 16, 2002
- 27,287
- 16,123
- 136
Originally posted by: Viditor
Some things to remember...
1. AMD and IBM have already produced lab (hand tooled) versions of the 45nm as well at East Fishkill...they are also working on the 22nm versions.
2. The Penryn won't be until ~2008.
3. AMD is shipping their quad cores at the beginning of 2007
We really don't know how things will play out for either company that far out (remember that 3 years ago, Intel predicted 10 GHz air-cooled Netburst chips for 2006...).
Either way, it's gonna be a fun decade!
Viditor, you allways have a way of saying what I do in a much more eloquent manner.
HAY get off AMD this is a Intel post . All the post states is that Intel has 45 nano leakage beat and this is what I got so far talk about trolls.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From richuk
lol .. AMD we will be right there to catch them up, or over take them with performance at that point in time so you have to look at both sides before w00ting for Intel.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
From Markfw
Whats wrong with "wait and see"? Its still gossip until somebody benches one.
Mark whats bench marking got to do with leakage
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Clarkey 01
As if AMD dont have anything in development and are hoping an x2 in 3 years will still be enough to have the performance crown..
This Intel come back isnt the second coming of christ
Clarkey they fixed the leakage thats all.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Viditor
1. AMD and IBM have already produced lab (hand tooled) versions of the 45nm as well at East Fishkill...they are also working on the 22nm versions
Ya lets here about the first tapout of the 65 n before you sput off about the 45n
3. AMD is shipping their quad cores at the beginning of 2007
So is Intel maybe 2006 Intels well be 65n Maybe 45n in 2007
$$$$$$$$$$$$$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#################^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Talk about trolls you are among the people always accusing others
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From richuk
lol .. AMD we will be right there to catch them up, or over take them with performance at that point in time so you have to look at both sides before w00ting for Intel.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
From Markfw
Whats wrong with "wait and see"? Its still gossip until somebody benches one.
Mark whats bench marking got to do with leakage
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Clarkey 01
As if AMD dont have anything in development and are hoping an x2 in 3 years will still be enough to have the performance crown..
This Intel come back isnt the second coming of christ
Clarkey they fixed the leakage thats all.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Viditor
1. AMD and IBM have already produced lab (hand tooled) versions of the 45nm as well at East Fishkill...they are also working on the 22nm versions
Ya lets here about the first tapout of the 65 n before you sput off about the 45n
3. AMD is shipping their quad cores at the beginning of 2007
So is Intel maybe 2006 Intels well be 65n Maybe 45n in 2007
$$$$$$$$$$$$$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#################^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Talk about trolls you are among the people always accusing others
This post and the post to day and yesterday is just unfo i got off the web . I highly suspect your a coward hiding behind a keyboard
Hay richey intel has the Super PI record
Hay richey intel has the Super PI record
I highly suspect you failed engligh too.
Yes, it is well known that the Pentium M holds the Super Pi record.
RichUK
Lifer
- Feb 14, 2005
- 10,341
- 678
- 126
was that aimed at me .. if so WTF ..
and yes i am aware that the Dothan holds the 1M super-pi record .. this is because it offloads it all into the 2Mb L2 cache, and the level 2 cache has a low latency, match that with high clock speed and you have a winner for just the 1M super-pi run .. and if you think i am an AMD fanboi you are very much mistaken ..
Ummm...AMD has been producing sample 65nm chips for months now...try google.
Both Intel and AMD will be shipping 65nm chips next year, 45nm won't be production ready till at least the end of 2007, which means that it won't ship till 2008.
BTW...please point to ANY post wherein I referred to you as a troll!
One last note...Intel's planned quad cores are not integrated. They will be similar to Smithfield in that they will be 2 Woodcrest chips glued together. In addition, they will still be utilizing the FSB model instead of ptp...this means that the bandwidth of 4 cores will all have to fit on a 1066MHz FSB. This will be a HUGE bottleneck!
Towards 2007/2008, they will probably move it to the Whitefield's platform (with the CSI ptp), and that will be when we see it perform properly.
Ummm...AMD has been producing sample 65nm chips for months now...try google.
Both Intel and AMD will be shipping 65nm chips next year, 45nm won't be production ready till at least the end of 2007, which means that it won't ship till 2008.
Post link of a fab tapout please.
Both Intel and AMD will be shipping 65nm chips next year, 45nm won't be production ready till at least the end of 2007, which means that it won't ship till 2008.
Post link of a fab tapout please.
What i dont get is that they say that leakage isnt a problem on 45nm - which is nice, but therefore surely intel couldve seen early enough that leakage would be a problem on their preshots.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter