Just a joke....
But wouldn't it make sense following amd line to add a pr rating to show its boost in performance related to the earlier willamette p4 line....For you who think the amd pr rating is related to a p4 go ahead and explain why every 66mhz equals 100pr pts yet amd cpu scale no better per clock then p4's.....
p4 willamette 2ghz is basis....512kb added about 8-10 percent in performance....so
p4 2000+ = p4 1.8a
p4 2200+ = p4 2.0a
p4 2400+ = p4 2.2a
then ofcourse another adjustment would come with the 533fsb
p4 2600+ = p4 2.26b
p4 2800+ = p4 2.4b
seems kind of funny...at least with earlier 400fsb it would have scaled properly...
But wouldn't it make sense following amd line to add a pr rating to show its boost in performance related to the earlier willamette p4 line....For you who think the amd pr rating is related to a p4 go ahead and explain why every 66mhz equals 100pr pts yet amd cpu scale no better per clock then p4's.....
p4 willamette 2ghz is basis....512kb added about 8-10 percent in performance....so
p4 2000+ = p4 1.8a
p4 2200+ = p4 2.0a
p4 2400+ = p4 2.2a
then ofcourse another adjustment would come with the 533fsb
p4 2600+ = p4 2.26b
p4 2800+ = p4 2.4b
seems kind of funny...at least with earlier 400fsb it would have scaled properly...
