• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Intel P4 or AMD Athlon

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.


<< have a P4 1.4 and a t-bird 1.33. t-bird may be faster but I like the P4 better. >>



so u like paying more for less? only thing i notice p4 has if u take off the heatsink like a dumb F*** then the P4 wont fry. yet athlon will.

but if u get passed that i dont see why u want the 1.4 p4 over 1.33 t-bird




<< Abit?s new 845 board is $140 (It has Raid for backup, and probably will O/C the. P4-1.5GHz to 1.7GHz). P4 1.5GHz (428 pins) is also $140. >>



yes it will be good enouhg but u could still get a faster amd system for cheaper. ALSO why overclock if all u do is office work. wouldnt u want stability more than the extra 200mhz? just a thought 🙂
 
Since the price drop of P4s and the new availibility to use SDRAM with the 478pin P4s, prices between AMD and Intel systems are much closer now.

But the performance delta between the P4 and the TBird increases when you use SDR RAM with the P4.

I'm sorry but as of now the only reason to buy a P4 is if you only run multimedia apps, need SSE2 and/or need clock throttling.
 
It's quite logical that the P4 should be targeted at multimedia and games. You can only do so much for Microsoft Office with a processor.
I like the clock throttling on a P4. I'd probably use it like that half the time for a quiet computer.
 
Hey ahsia, it's called marketing my friend...

Alot of ppl fall for the Supernet uhh.. burst$#!t and whatever other cheesy slogans you'll find on P4 posters... why?

Because they're idiots outside!!!!!
 
Hey ahsia, it's called marketing my friend...

Alot of ppl fall for the Supernet uhh.. burst$#!t and whatever other cheesy slogans you'll find on P4 posters... why?

Because they're idiots outside!!!!!
 
A few words on why the P4 comes in SDRAM flavour motherboards.

1: Remember that corporations try to sell - selling something that costs LESS is easier.

2: Remember that 90% of users DON'T need powerhouses. Sure, having a P4 1.5 GHz is nice, but if they're using their system mostly for www-browsing, Word-processing and the odd game, there's not much point in spending the additional money for a high-spec system.

3: DDR seems to be an interesting contender to RDRAM. From what I've seen, RDRAM may be the better option overall, but DDR is definately a very good "go between" for the more performance aware users. Remember again, that most people aren't.

SDRAM is nice & cheap - so are the boards. Intel, no doubt, would like to see the P4 instead of the P3 across its entire range (there being high-end, medium, and low-cost ranges). Obviously, you can't get an RDRAM based system as easily into say a 600$ price range (or whatever) as you can get a system with SDRAM.

Equally, a 600$ system won't be coming with a GF3, but a GF2 MX200 or MX400 - which should be enough for occasional gaming.

I hope this lights up why there are SDRAM mobo's out there for P4. They're not supposed to be a CONTENDER for RDRAM-based P4. They're doing their job quite well though - lowering the total cost of a P4 system for more cost-concious users (i.e.: SDRAM == cheaper).

It's all down to marketing, and selling different "solutions" for the different product ranges.

Hope this makes sense & explains things 🙂.
 
Something I don't think I've seen posted here is the fact that the SiS 735 based mobo's can also use SDRAM. For those with SDRAM laying around and very tight budgets, this is a doable solution until you can afford to buy DDR memory. I think this makes an AMD based solution all the more appealing. Other then that, as others have posted, I'd personally wait for KT266A based boards to come out. They look to be the fastest DDR solution for AMD chips, plus from the previews they look like they'll be pretty stable as well.
 
Back
Top