- Jan 6, 2014
- 901
- 2
- 76
I am looking to upgrade from my Intel Gigabit CT adapters sometime in the next several months. I currently have a pair sitting in both my server and my desktop. I'd like to consolidate to a dual port adapter in each.
I am currently eyeing the Intel 340-t2 and 350-t2. Anyone have advice or suggestions on either? I see that the 350-t2 is listed at nearly twice the power consumption as the 340, but also scads of power saving features that the 340 doesn't have. So I assume that the "typical" power consumption is in a true active Tx/Rx state and not with the link being relatively idle.
The 350 seems to have a few nicer features than the 340, but maybe I am not understanding much of the import on them as I don't see any differences that would actually make a difference to me.
Does anyone have experience in both (could be the t4 versions too is fine) in terms of real world performance of both large file and small file transfers as well as directory copies or multiple TCP streams?
I assume both NICs support wake from S5 if the host motherboard ACPI has it?
Lastly, on the 340-t2, anyone know anything about the IBM 49Y4230 NICs? I know they are i340-t2 based, but are they locked to IBM server motherboards only? Or will they work on others? I see a number of them floating around used all the time.
Alternately, anything on the Startech 350-t2 based card? It seems like the cheapest 350-t2 based card around by a resonable margin and if I am going to go in on anything new, that seems like the one to go for.
Pretty much trying to determine what I should go for as my next NICs to last me another 5-8 years (dependent upon 10GbE penetrating way down the cost ladder).
Thanks!
I am currently eyeing the Intel 340-t2 and 350-t2. Anyone have advice or suggestions on either? I see that the 350-t2 is listed at nearly twice the power consumption as the 340, but also scads of power saving features that the 340 doesn't have. So I assume that the "typical" power consumption is in a true active Tx/Rx state and not with the link being relatively idle.
The 350 seems to have a few nicer features than the 340, but maybe I am not understanding much of the import on them as I don't see any differences that would actually make a difference to me.
Does anyone have experience in both (could be the t4 versions too is fine) in terms of real world performance of both large file and small file transfers as well as directory copies or multiple TCP streams?
I assume both NICs support wake from S5 if the host motherboard ACPI has it?
Lastly, on the 340-t2, anyone know anything about the IBM 49Y4230 NICs? I know they are i340-t2 based, but are they locked to IBM server motherboards only? Or will they work on others? I see a number of them floating around used all the time.
Alternately, anything on the Startech 350-t2 based card? It seems like the cheapest 350-t2 based card around by a resonable margin and if I am going to go in on anything new, that seems like the one to go for.
Pretty much trying to determine what I should go for as my next NICs to last me another 5-8 years (dependent upon 10GbE penetrating way down the cost ladder).
Thanks!