- Nov 14, 2011
- 10,232
- 5,012
- 136
Sharing system memory would be a disaster. You would need to route every memory request over PCIe, and Intel only put a PCIe x4 connection on Tiger Lake... It would perform worse than the integrated graphics.
Sharing system memory would be a disaster. You would need to route every memory request over PCIe, and Intel only put a PCIe x4 connection on Tiger Lake... It would perform worse than the integrated graphics.
PlanetJosh
Golden Member
- May 6, 2013
- 1,815
- 143
- 106
Sharing system memory in total is 100% impossible, it would perform far worse than a IGP. what they COULD do is to have 1GB of memory and market the card as "up to 4GB" and use the fast 1GB of VRAM as a cache... that is actually possible and it would be faster than a igp, in fact some cheap nvidia oems did this with low end cards in the past that actually had 128/256mb of vram and they marketed them as "up to 1GB".
It would be interesting to know what deal Raja closed with Intel when they hired him. What are they expecting regarding market share/ margins/execution etc.
Lol, imagine the following conversation circa 2017 at the interview:
Raja "GPU space is very different than CPU, the competition is fearless, as you know we launched in Q2 2016 a 232mm2 256bit 8GB design on a leading process at $239, are you really willing to be competitive with these guys and launch after say five years a 16GB 232mm2 256bit card on a leading process at $239?
Intel: "Yes we know, you have a deal, now put it there!"
lol, I'm just messing around, but if the conversation went anywhere near, how can he not be successful?
I am joking of course, please don't start writing about the greater plan, HPC importance, or drivers and optimization etc...
Lol, imagine the following conversation circa 2017 at the interview:
Raja "GPU space is very different than CPU, the competition is fearless, as you know we launched in Q2 2016 a 232mm2 256bit 8GB design on a leading process at $239, are you really willing to be competitive with these guys and launch after say five years a 16GB 232mm2 256bit card on a leading process at $239?
Intel: "Yes we know, you have a deal, now put it there!"
lol, I'm just messing around, but if the conversation went anywhere near, how can he not be successful?
I am joking of course, please don't start writing about the greater plan, HPC importance, or drivers and optimization etc...
Dedicated LPDDR4x says Raichu. Iris Xe Max could be the branding: https://ranker.sisoftware.co.uk/sho...efdae9daefdce9cfbd80b096f396ab9bbdcef3cb&l=en
Is it possible though? I mean I don't know, but the last 2 years Intel had a serious problem fulfilling demand and now they just wasting die space like that? Or the 10SF yields are so bad?
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2003
- 8,686
- 3,785
- 136
So they want to have DG2 with 128EUs as the lowest end and with GDDR6 interface, but also have DG1, that's the same one in Tigerlake but everything else except the memory controller, and GPU cut off entirely.
@naukkis There's nothing preventing them making the die only having the GPU and the LPDDR4x interface. It'll be small like 50mm2. They sold Atoms with 25mm2 dies, and the just announced Elkhart Lake IoT Atom is 60mm2 for the CPU.
Still its a very different strategy from what normal GPU vendors use. Normally you'd just cut half the memory interface.
The only guess I can give is that this allows for fast TTM, since DG2 is still a ways away(as in late 2021).
@naukkis There's nothing preventing them making the die only having the GPU and the LPDDR4x interface. It'll be small like 50mm2. They sold Atoms with 25mm2 dies, and the just announced Elkhart Lake IoT Atom is 60mm2 for the CPU.
Still its a very different strategy from what normal GPU vendors use. Normally you'd just cut half the memory interface.
The only guess I can give is that this allows for fast TTM, since DG2 is still a ways away(as in late 2021).
There is. They need die space to be able to use 4*32 bit LpDDR4x memory interface. So if they make GPU-die they would use 64 bit GDDR5/6 memory interface to be able to make smallest possible die for only 96EUs. So it is probably just Tigerlake with disabled CPU-cores, 10nm yields still sucks and they can salvage something - although 96EU GPU is worth about nothing.
Last edited:
No way they will use the Tigerlake die for DG1 with just disabled parts, no way. They have to disable a lot more than just CPU cores, look at the Soc.
We are talking about 10 nm here. There's going to be plenty of chips to salvage from. As far as I can tell Intel doesn't have any Tiger Lake SKUs with an intact GPU but disabled CPU cores.
Have to agree that a real monolithic die would use GDDR6.
The other option goes back to the Rocket Lake using chiplets rumor. 10 nm PCH + 10 nm GPU die.
This is a waste of 10nm capacity because there are large parts unrelated to CPU and GPU wich would be useless for DG1 and therefore this idea is pure madness. Also the yield issues (if they still have) seem to be more GPU affected, the amount of Icelake devices in the market without a fully enabled CPU variant (Core i3) are rather small, they didn't even need a Pentium/Celeron lineup. Tigerlake shouldn't do worse in this regards.
RKL-S is a fully 14nm chip, the chiplets rumor for a tiny GT1 graphics never made sense from the beginning. It only made sense for a GT2 but since RKL-U has been cancelled this is not even an option.
RKL-S is a fully 14nm chip, the chiplets rumor for a tiny GT1 graphics never made sense from the beginning. It only made sense for a GT2 but since RKL-U has been cancelled this is not even an option.
That's why I'm inclined to believe it is more likely salvaged Tiger Lake dies that the alternative would be the Trash Can.
Exclusive: Intel Arctic Sound Specifications and Intel Architecture On NIC
Technology Vision
adoredtv.com
Xe HP seems to get 8 threads per EU instead of 7 theads per EU on Xe LP. It's Artic Sound (Gen12.5 HP) but should be the same for all Gen12 HP variants.
Exclusive: Intel Arctic Sound Specifications and Intel Architecture On NIC
Technology Vision
From picture it seems that DG1 has exactly same size of die as Tigerlake-U.
This is likely Gen12 HP based. 128 EUs and 1024 shaders processors--> it must have 8 threads per EU. Gen12 LP only has 7 threads per EU. Performance looks good for only 1.4 Ghz.
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2003
- 8,686
- 3,785
- 136
The picture doesn't show anything relating to 8 threads.
It says 128 cores and 1024 SPs. The Xe LP shows 96 cores and 768 SPs. It has an 1:8 relationship because cores in Intel case is an EU, and each EU can process 8 FP instructions.
4GB LPDDR4x confirmed and it's a discrete memory by the looks of it, it clearly says 4GB VRAM.
Some more Asus pictures: https://www.laptopspirit.fr/276992/...er-lake-iris-xe-dg1-thunderbolt-4-numpad.html
There are big air intakes on the left side, the cooling is much bigger than usual. In might also help Tigerlake, maybe a true 28W CPU.
DeathReborn
Platinum Member
- Oct 11, 2005
- 2,746
- 740
- 136
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2003
- 8,686
- 3,785
- 136
The Max branding reminds me of ATI Rage Fury Maxx having two chips.
Got nothing useful to say, eh?
According to the latest version of the Windows driver, DG2 supports AV1 encoding.
Code:
.?AVDecodeAv1PipelineAdapterG12@@
.?AV?$_Ref_count_obj2@VAv1PipelineG12@decode@@@std@@
.?AVEncodeAv1VdencPipelineAdapterG12@@
.?AVEncodeAv1VdencPipelineAdapterG12Dg2@@
.?AV?$_Ref_count_obj2@VAv1VdencPipelineG12Dg2@encode@@@std@@
.?AVAv1DecodePktG12@decode@@
.?AVAv1PipelineG12@decode@@
.?AVAv1DecodePicPktG12@decode@@
.?AVAv1DecodeTilePktG12@decode@@
.?AVDecodeAv1FeatureManagerG12@decode@@
.?AV?$_Ref_count_obj2@VAv1VdencPipelineG12@encode@@@std@@
.?AVAv1VdencPipelineG12@encode@@
.?AVAv1VdencPipelineG12Dg2@encode@@
.?AVAv1VdencPktG12@encode@@
.?AVAv1VdencPktG12Dg2@encode@@
.?AVAv1DecodeFilmGrainG12@decode@@
Dayman1225
Golden Member
- Aug 14, 2017
- 1,152
- 974
- 146
Intel has confirmed in their earnings that DG1 is currently shipping to customer for revenue and that DG2 has powered on.
They also confirmed that Xe Max branding is for dGPU/DG1
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 9K
-
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 7K
-
Facebook
Twitter