LIMITED EDITION is just the name, not an attribute of the SKU. The LIMITED EDITION cards are as limited as Sapphire TOXIC cards are toxic!
Yes, yes, yes. OK.
They said stock of the 16GB was going to be really
limited and that the generally available stock was going to be the 8GB variants of both cards.
Can you imagine if Nvidia had dropped a 3070Ti in 8GB and 16GB flavors and then when the original shipment of 16GB cards sold out they never made anymore, but the first run of reviews lauded the 3070Ti for alleviating memory issues that the lesser SKUs faced? That wouldn't age well either.
Hopefully Intel bothers to create more 16GB cards. That will be a test of their commitment to the bit, imo.
Written Kit Guru reviews for both models.
https://www.kitguru.net/components/...-moass/intel-arc-a770-limited-edition-review/
https://www.kitguru.net/components/...-moass/intel-arc-a750-limited-edition-review/
He notes that despite okay fps that the cards were borderline unplayable in
Cyberpunk correction Days Gone. It gets worse from there.
I am going to quote the conclusion:
"Throughout my testing, I experienced incredibly poor frame times in certain games, visual glitches that affected two of the twelve games I wanted to benchmark, as well as game crashes and even system BSODs. Performance in DX11 titles is also a huge problem for Arc, while Rebar is absolutely essential for a hope of a smooth gaming experience. I'd add to that by saying I wasn't trying to go out of my way to find problems. I simply set out to benchmark a wide variety of titles, and this was my experience.
The problems are so varied and significant that it becomes impossible to recommend buying an ARC GPU right now. While the $349 price point for the A770 Limited Edition certainly looks good on paper, multiple RX 6650 XTs are currently selling on
Newegg.com for between $300-329. That GPU offers performance that is broadly similar but on a platform that is just head and shoulders above Arc in terms of stability and consistency.
I'd also add to that with a word of caution on the A770 itself. My testing doesn't show a particularly large delta between the A750 and the A770, with the later card 9% faster on average at 1080p, despite being priced 21% higher. The A770
8GB model may well make more sense, but certainly, the A750 looks more attractive on paper.
That point is entirely academic at present though, as currently, we are not in a position to recommend any of the Arc lineup – Intel has plenty more work to do before we can consider making nuanced recommendations. We remain optimistic that Arc could be a success in the future, as we say there certainly are glimpses of strong potential here, and we look forward to testing the A750 and A770 as major updates land and hopefully change the picture.
Right now, however, Intel Arc isn't ready for the mainstream market."
It has felt like an eternity since we first had official confirmation of Intel's plan to enter the d
www.kitguru.net