News Intel GPUs - Intel launches A580

[igor_kavinski]

It's an Intel, guys. Buy it as a secondary GPU. Try replaying games on it when you are bored. Torture it with OC and OV. AMD users need not apply. You are not good enough for Intel and besides, you already betrayed Intel. Intel doesn't care about you. Finally, Intel has a GPU to sell to you with their F and KF CPU SKUs.

Let's make Intel some money. Let's help them recover from their mistakes. We can't have Intel being so embarrassed every year and trying to save its face. We have a responsibility to the company that started the PC revolution with the 8086. There would be no AMD without Intel. Who would they copycat? They are at their best when Intel innovates (Pentium 4 10 GHz!). How did Epyc sell well? Coz Intel created those customers in the first place. Intel must rise once more and we must open our hearts (and wallets) to them generously.

 

[coercitiv]

Let's make Intel some money.

I'll buy the premium AV1 hardware, and I will beta test the freeGPU that comes attached to it. I'll even allow all the reporting they need, gotta support the driver team!

I'm only half kidding, my old Coffee Lake system which is currently doing Plex/HTPC duty has a firmware update for Resizable Bar.

 

[GodisanAtheist]

LOL, perfect headline change. I always knew this would happen. But for us gamers, this is the perfect storm. New products coming out at every door and bitcoin to the dumpster which leads to market being flooded with GPU's. It's gonna be helluva year.

- This might finally be the year where I can move off my 980ti and 6600k combo and get the quake remaster to run at over 9000fps.

 

[DrMrLordX]

"There are dozens of us. DOZENS!"

They should optimize Arc around We Happy Few.

 

[Spjut]

Seriously though, get a low profile A380/A310 version out and I'll get one for the novelty value and AV1 decoder.

I would too. I miss the days when you could upgrade an old PC for relatively cheap by getting GT x10 model and get hw acceleration for all the new standards.
Thought I would never get Intel for a gaming PC at this point.

 

[mikk]

rBAR works on a Ryzen 5 5600X and MSI B550 Tomahawk. Even the fanstop works which didn't work on Intel.

Intel Arc A380 mit OC und auf AMD Ryzen im Test: Benchmarks mit Ryzen und rBAR sowie der Fanstop

Intel Arc A380 von Gunnir: Benchmarks mit Ryzen und rBAR sowie der Fanstop / Intel Arc A380 auf dem AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

www.computerbase.de

 

[mikk]

ASRock ARC A380

https://twitter.com/x/status/1551590541279858689

 

[mikk]

Techpowerup posted a new A380 review with lots of games.

Ray Tracing tests with 9 games. Overall it's obvious Ray Tracing performance is much stronger versus RDNA2, 6400 and 6500 XT are not doing well in comparison.

Intel Arc A380 Review - Runs Fine on AMD Ryzen

Intel Arc A380 is the first graphics card that the Blue Team is releasing this year. It's based on the new Xe "Alchemist" architecture, which includes support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. In our in-depth review of the A380 we check rasterization performance, RT performance, power, heat...

www.techpowerup.com

 

[VirtualLarry]

Overall it's obvious Ray Tracing performance is much stronger versus RDNA2, 6400 and 6500 XT are not doing well in comparison.

Intel finding it's niche for budget GPUs?

 

[Leeea]

Intel finding it's niche for budget GPUs?

1080p Control - raytracing A380: 18 fps
cyberpunk - 10 fps
deathloop - 25 fps
doom - 43 fps
F1 - 35 fps
Far Cry - 23 fps
Metro - 23 fps
Resident - 28 fps
Legion - 12 fps


Niche is a relative term.

 

[pakotlar]

Techpowerup posted a new A380 review with lots of games.

Ray Tracing tests with 9 games. Overall it's obvious Ray Tracing performance is much stronger versus RDNA2, 6400 and 6500 XT are not doing well in comparison.

Intel Arc A380 Review - Runs Fine on AMD Ryzen

Intel Arc A380 is the first graphics card that the Blue Team is releasing this year. It's based on the new Xe "Alchemist" architecture, which includes support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. In our in-depth review of the A380 we check rasterization performance, RT performance, power, heat...

www.techpowerup.com

Im encouraged by this. Beta driver seems a lot more stable, raytracing hit is only a bit worse than RTX 3000 series, which is remarkable given the state of the drivers and the fact that this is Intel’s first attempt.

A770 is going to be a fine card. Too late, but a good first showing. Driver team needs to pull some late nights and push out driver improvements like a guinea pig pushes out poops. Hard and fast.

 

[mikk]

Im encouraged by this. Beta driver seems a lot more stable, raytracing hit is only a bit worse than RTX 3000 series, which is remarkable given the state of the drivers and the fact that this is Intel’s first attempt.

A770 is going to be a fine card. Too late, but a good first showing. Driver team needs to pull some late nights and push out driver improvements like a guinea pig pushes out poops. Hard and fast.

There is a new driver coming in August with the new idle power state and other bugfixes. The entire Arc lineup should be out in August or September btw. They said it's coming before the Intel innovation event: Twitch

About DX9, DX11 driver, Battlemage learning and improvements: Twitch

About rBar: Twitch

 

[Aapje]

I'm encouraged by this. Beta driver seems a lot more stable, raytracing hit is only a bit worse than RTX 3000 series, which is remarkable given the state of the drivers and the fact that this is Intel’s first attempt.

Not really that surprising given that raytracing is a clean DirectX 12 API.

 

[TESKATLIPOKA]

RT performance looks better than RDNA2.

	RX 6400	RX 6500XT	Arc A380
Process [nm]	6	6	6
Die size [mm^2]	107	107	157
Configuration [SP:TMU:ROP]	768:48:32 (12CU)	1024:64:32 (16CU)	1024:64:32 (128EU)
Bandwidth [GB/s]	128	144	186
Average (Median) frequency [MHz]	2270 (2285)	2753 (2758)	1953 (2540)
GFLOPs from Average(Median) frequency	3487 (3510)	5638 (5648)	4000 (5202)
Performance	96 [100%]	123 [128%]	102 [106%]
Power consumption [W]	51	89	78

This level of raster performance is very bad for a product, which is so much bigger yet slower than RX 6500XT. Power consumption is also a lot worse than a similarly performant RX 6400, yet they are using the same process.

edit: Average(Median) frequency, performance and power consumption is from Techpowerup review.

 

[mikk]

This level of raster performance is very bad for a product, which is so much bigger yet slower than RX 6500XT. Power consumption is also a lot worse than a similarly performant RX 6400, yet they are using the same process.

edit: Average(Median) frequency, performance and power consumption is from Techpowerup review.

It doesn't look that bad considering the driver is so immature. RX6400 clocks with 2130 to 2289 MHz in games (as per techpowerup review) while the A380 Gunnir clocks with 2450 Mhz. This will give the RX 6400 a logical efficiency advantage just from the lower clocks. Also the A380 with more VRAM, a bigger memory interface and twice the PCIe Lanes which certainly is not a performance boost in all of these 1080p games but adds to the board power. The big size difference is explainable. There is no encoder engine in 6400/6500 whereas A380 has two encoder including AV1 decoding/encoding support and also two decoder, it must be much smaller of course alongside other reasons (less display pipes, less PCIe lanes, smaller memory interface, no XMX units, less capable Ray Tracing units).

 

[igor_kavinski]

Plus Intel's MSRP for A380 is supposed to be $150, which is very good for a 6 GB card.

Intel Arc A770, A750, A580, A380, A310 prices and specifications revealed by new leak. - NotebookCheck.net News



Geforce 1650 does not have RT so ARC has a good advantage.

 

[TESKATLIPOKA]

It doesn't look that bad considering the driver is so immature. RX6400 clocks with 2130 to 2289 MHz in games (as per techpowerup review) while the A380 Gunnir clocks with 2450 Mhz. This will give the RX 6400 a logical efficiency advantage just from the lower clocks. Also the A380 with more VRAM, a bigger memory interface and twice the PCIe Lanes which certainly is not a performance boost in all of these 1080p games but adds to the board power. The big size difference is explainable. There is no encoder engine in 6400/6500 whereas A380 has two encoder including AV1 decoding/encoding support and also two decoder, it must be much smaller of course alongside other reasons (less display pipes, less PCIe lanes, smaller memory interface, no XMX units, less capable Ray Tracing units).

Even RX 6500XT is a bit more efficient(performance/W) and that one has higher clocks than Intel and Its performance barely scales with frequency increase, which is obvious If you compare 6400 vs 6500XT. GFLOPs increases by 60% thanks to 1/3 more CU and 21% higher clocks, but performance increase is only 28%. Power consumption during gaming also increases by a staggering 75%, because of high Voltage(1.2V vs 0.95V).

A hypothetical 157mm2 RDNA2 GPU should look like this at least:
20CU, 80TMU, 32ROPs, 96bit GDDR6 6GB Vram, 24MB IF. + 8x PCIe4 + full Media decoding/encoding + display pipes.
Yes, there would be no AI engine and RT would be still worse, but these things are not important for an entry level GPU.
I think this would perform close to RTX 3050 and that one is 85% faster than Arc A380.
Power consumption shouldn't be worse than RX 6500XT thanks to lower clocks.
With this in mind I have no reason to be impressed with Arc A380.
It's a good first try, but that's all.

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Plus Intel's MSRP for A380 is supposed to be $150, which is very good for a 6 GB card.

I am conflicted on this point. Being able to use higher textures in some games is always welcomed. OTOH, it is such a slow card. Confining the purchase to a typical tight budget gaming build, throws a Monkeywrench in the value analysis. Ray tracing on cards of this level is a marketing checkbox. Can't slap it in an old Optiplex or the like, no rebar. And based on TPU's testing, if they offer versions without the power connector, it may lose a little more performance yet. He had it using 80W. Then it used 94W with as much as 101W spikes with a power virus. Which will likely make a slot powered model less attractive than the 1650 and 6400 for that niche of builds.

I love the budget gaming segment. I paid less than $117.50 for the single slot 6400, and that came with Saints Row which will be a $40-$60 game on release. I would not have bought it at $150 out of pocket, despite it being the king of its tiny niche. The 6500XT is a better 1080p gamer than the ARC particularly when realistic settings for budget cards are used for testing. Another 2GB of ram and better RT, should not tip the scales the other way for the savvy shopper trying to maximize bang for buck. It needs to be $125 at most to make sense, and the $100 TPU calculated is where it would shine.

 

[PingSpike]

There is a new driver coming in August with the new idle power state

I hope so because the A380 has terrible idle power consumption based on this review:

Intel Arc A380 Review - Runs Fine on AMD Ryzen

Intel Arc A380 is the first graphics card that the Blue Team is releasing this year. It's based on the new Xe "Alchemist" architecture, which includes support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. In our in-depth review of the A380 we check rasterization performance, RT performance, power, heat...

www.techpowerup.com

Kind of puts the damper on buying it for a transcoding card in a server to me.

 

[pakotlar]

Plus Intel's MSRP for A380 is supposed to be $150, which is very good for a 6 GB card.

Intel Arc A770, A750, A580, A380, A310 prices and specifications revealed by new leak. - NotebookCheck.net News

View attachment 65074

Geforce 1650 does not have RT so ARC has a good advantage.

Given the techpowerup review, it does seem Intel is accurately, if a bit conservatively positioning the 380. If the 770 position is similarly accurate we may see it trading blows with 3070 on modern games.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Given the techpowerup review

Good review and I think Intel is not in a terrible position. It's a great improvement over DG1.

 

[Tup3x]

It's encouraging to see that the new beta drivers fixed so much. It might not be that bad when they officially launch the cards. Once they iron out the obvious issues, they are in pretty good situation and can concentrate on getting the performance up.

 

[mikk]

Quicksync H264 streaming compared to NVENC and AMF:

AV1 test follows.

 

[jpiniero]

Gotta figure with Intel's brutal results they have to be at least thinking about pulling the plug on Arc. Maybe they will let DG2 run it's course and then call it a day.

 

[HurleyBird]

That would be short-sighted and reactionary.