I know that the classic SETI got a big time boos when CPUs went from 256k cache to 500k and then to 1 mb, because then allmost all of the core code lines could fit into the cache and latency went down big time as well.
Today I don't think that the cache makes that much of a difference anymore. As BOINC projects have memory footprints basically always larger than 10 MB, I'd say it won't matter much. F@H also has a really large footprint these days.
I read a lot about comparing the different cache sizes on the X2 CPUs from AMD and only in very specific and small apps, the extra cache gave some 5% to 7% gain over the smaller cache at same clock speed.
In that respect, go for the cheaper one! It might be a tadd slower, but it'll also consume less power 😉