Trust me, there's no need to double post.
Fair point, the article doesn't even mention 10nm so it's off topic too.Trust me, there's no need to double post.
And Cannonlake-U finally met the trashcan.Cannonlake-Y coming, but in June of 2018.
And Cannonlake-U finally met the trashcan.
Oh well.
Supposedly so.So are those the 2+2 chips or what?
Cannonlake-Y coming, but in June of 2018.
Cannonlake-Y was supposed to be shipping right now. Good grief.
So are those the 2+2 chips or what?
Some vendors are even considering skipping Cannon Lake to wait for the release of its successor, the Ice Lake CPUs, which according to Intel's roadmap, should be available shortly after the specific processors' rescheduled launch, the sources said.
I wonder if Intel is still releasing that 8 core CFL but it won't be released until Jan 19.
AMD will skin them alive for that.Q3 19 for Icelake U/Y and Q1 20 for everything else Icelake.
AMD will skin them alive for that.
It's suicide.
Redacted, it's not about something being bad, it's about the thing being late.You are being dramatic.
In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.
Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
You are being dramatic.
In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.
Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
About time if he is leaving. He looks to be as bad as Hector Ruinz.
About time if he is leaving. He looks to be as bad as Hector Ruinz.
In the days of Pentium III, the Athlon came out, and the downhill started for Intel. What no one realized was that their solution turned out to be none other than Netburst architecture. That, was their real mistake.
Will their Netburst of this generation turn out to be Skylake-based architectures and 10nm? Or will it start with Sapphire Rapid?
About time if he is leaving. He looks to be as bad as Hector Ruinz.
Besides, Sapphire Rapids may never make it to the desktop.
With the Pentium III, Intel couldn't figure out how to up clockspeeds. Took em awhile (Tualatin, Banias, Dothan, Yonah, Conroe, etc) to get back to it.
Got to cash those shares before it becomes a lot less valuable. I think by Q3 2018 it will be obvious which direction their stock is headed. Down, down and down.
Got to cash those shares before it becomes a lot less valuable. I think by Q3 2018 it will be obvious which direction their stock is headed. Down, down and down.