- Apr 27, 2000
If Intel is launching 400W 10nm CPUs, then . . . woof.
I said "if", not "when". Learn to read.Jumping on an unsubstantiated rumor to find some new way to bash Intel's power consumption? Woof yourself.
Then why not wait for your criticism until you find whether it is true or not?I said "if", not "when". Learn to read.
You and I both know that Intel has no business launching 400W parts on server sockets in this day and age. Cooper Lake was kicked off the 2P platform for a reason.
Nobody else does. Stop being so sensitive. It's tedious.Then why not wait for your criticism
To be fair it's a pretty old rumour now, there's absolutely no guarantee it will happen especially not - like you said - when you consider that 2P Cooper got canned and CL-AP has had minimal traction.The mere fact that anyone considers a 400W 10nm SKU to be credible speaks volumes about Intel right now.
My expectation is that 38c 270W Ice Lake-SP will be the top SKU they release, assuming they actually release it. Trying anything bigger that chews up more power would be completely insane unless a big customer specifically wants the SKU for internal use only.To be fair it's a pretty old rumour now, there's absolutely no guarantee it will happen especially not - like you said - when you consider that 2P Cooper got canned and CL-AP has had minimal traction.
If you notice the 4800U is running Linux while the 1165G7 is running Windows. Linux is usually 10% faster. If you take the best 4800U Windows score the difference is >30%.Intel's 10nm Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 CPU has been benchmarked against the AMD Ryzen 7 4800U 7nm CPU showcasing a lead of up to 20%.wccftech.com
WCCFTech, but the author is reporting the flurry of recent Core i7-1165G7, and i5-1135G7 too, Geekbench benchmarks, and doing a comparison to Ryzen 4000U series.
Core i5-1135G7, a more commonplace processor tier, makes a good showing on Geekbench 4: 6049 single, 21469 multi. Compared to Ryzen 5 4500U and 4600U, ~20% lead in single-core score, and for multi-core, 6% lead over 4500U and ~4% deficit to 4600U. Taking a look at the details of the scores, Tiger Lake's multi-core is propped up by high crypto and memory score. If just looking at integer and floating-point, the multi-core score is tied with 4500U, and ~10% deficit to 4600U.
And just to throw more in, top Core i5-10210U scores are (not achieved in same result) 5217, 16854.
the first tick single thread gain is ok, if not very goodAt least for Geekbench the 1165G7 is 24% faster than the 1065G7 Windows-to-Windows best result comparison using Int and FP scores.
There will be cases where the 4700/4800U will have a greater advantage. In Geekbench ST 7W Amberlake performs nearly as well as the 25W U CPUs(16% difference) while in reality its significantly behind(45-50%). So Geekbench doesn't fully stress the CPUs or the tests are less realistic.
4700U shows 50-60% gain over the 1065G7 while in GB its less at 30-35%.
The MT performance might end up with a further lead over Icelake. For the 1135G7 it ends up with 9% gain in MT and 14% gain in MT over 1065G7. There is also an earlier result indicating the same.the first tick single thread gain is ok, if not very good
it all comes out to what is the all 4 core sustainable boost, there icelake fails
Yup. Though I don't think they got all the SKUs. Core i3 is shown as a 48EU while they have the Core i3 as having a G4 SKU. G4 could end up being a 64EU one.Notebookcheck was correct Core i5 get 80 EUs, even though it comes with G7 branding.
Not comparing against parts with higher TDP. Doubt manufacturers will set it higher than 25W PL1 anyway.You really should be comparing it to the 1068NG7 (and the AMD H parts), although there are no Windows GB4 results of the 1068NG7 on there.
Iris Plus 655 scores are weird, most Windows scores are in the ~40k range, but then you have the odd few that score high 50s and occasionally 60k. Not sure what's up with that.Not comparing against parts with higher TDP. Doubt manufacturers will set it higher than 25W PL1 anyway.
Update: Don't use Geekbench's OpenCL results for comparing graphics. The Iris Plus 655 which is a Gen 9 GT3e is just as fast as Iris Plus G7 in Icelake and beats Tigerlake's score.
Isn't the default PL1 on Tiger Lake U 28W? Could be a Geekbench reporting error as to what the actual base is though.Not comparing against parts with higher TDP. Doubt manufacturers will set it higher than 25W PL1 anyway.
Default doesn't have much meaning nowadays.Isn't the default PL1 on Tiger Lake U 28W? Could be a Geekbench reporting error as to what the actual base is though.
Yes. Of course it will boost higher (up to 65 W I believe) but will settle at 45W sustained power. It does have a cTDP of up to 54W though so it can use more if the OEM configures it as such. By contrast the 10980HK has a 45 W TDP and can use up to 135 W during boost and OEMs can configure it with a cTDP up to 65W.I thought Renoir HS was 35 watts and the regular H parts were 45 watts?
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|A||News Massive 20GB Intel IP Data Breach!||CPUs and Overclocking||18|
|Discussion [SA] Intel should not launch Ice Lake-SP||CPUs and Overclocking||23|
|News [Intel] Murthy is out||CPUs and Overclocking||7|
|S||Question Taiwan Report: Intel has reached an agreement with TSMC||CPUs and Overclocking||120|
|J||Question Two Intel Desktop CPUs: 2014-era Core i7 vs 2020 (current) Core i3?!||CPUs and Overclocking||9|