Intel 311 Larsen Creek vs. Ramdisk

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
Since the two are about the same in terms of cost per GB, I figured it would be fun to do a little test.

Intel 311 20GB SLC:
Intel_SSD_Larson_Creek_20GB_3.jpg.png


RAMDisk (QD32 test omitted because CDM is unstable when running that test with RAMdisk):
cdmf.jpg
 

XLNC

Senior member
Jan 18, 2008
249
0
0
Which app are you using for the Ramdisk? I use Dataram RAMdisk, and I tested mine using AS SSD benchmark utility, and got slightly slower results.
 

ksec

Senior member
Mar 5, 2010
420
117
116
That is actually a good point. And it is very possible that RAM will be dropping faster, or 8GB RAM comes out sooner that makes RAM Drive a much better option. ( Not to mention upto 100x performance from SSD )

With that in mind, i wonder with the advance of RAM and HDD speed, would there still be a place for SSD as cache?

And would it be possible to "fake" the Z68 into thinking RAM Drive as a SSD Cache?
 
Last edited:

groberts101

Golden Member
Mar 17, 2011
1,390
0
0
only question I would ponder is the ability to use the Z68 with a ramdisk. If the ramdisk was set to automatically run on the next boot, would the Intel software pick it up and reuse it each time or would it need to be manually cinfigured on each boot?

I'm guessing the 20GB SLC drive would be more plug and play friendly.

Then there's the added cost of a ramdisk app that uses larger than 4 gigs of space, right?
 

razel

Platinum Member
May 14, 2002
2,337
93
101
I'm sure it won't matter, since RAM is so fast the result will be the same, but you try rerunning it using the same dataset size? The Intel is tested with 1000MB vs RAMdisk 100MB. Though with RAMDisk I'm pretty sure it'll be the same, but I'm curious.
 

groberts101

Golden Member
Mar 17, 2011
1,390
0
0
yeah results are the same but if IIRC, you just need at least 3 gigs of space to run the benchmark at that size.
 

ksec

Senior member
Mar 5, 2010
420
117
116
So in the Context of Caching, we would need a Media ( HDD / SDD ) that has very high speed Seq Read to RAM. HDD actually isn't that bad at all. We would have to wait until SSD are cheap enough for 500GB or 1TB with High Seq Read. 4K or the rest doesn't matter.

Then we just need a software that works like Intel SRT to feed the frequently used data into RAM.
 

groberts101

Golden Member
Mar 17, 2011
1,390
0
0
Fancycache by Romex has been doing the same thing for a C-drive for some time now. You can even make a hybrid HDD with another portion of an available SSD.
 

ksec

Senior member
Mar 5, 2010
420
117
116
Fancycache by Romex has been doing the same thing for a C-drive for some time now. You can even make a hybrid HDD with another portion of an available SSD.

So basically Fancycache is Intel SRT, except done with RAM?
 

groberts101

Golden Member
Mar 17, 2011
1,390
0
0
No. Intel SRT is basically a less configurable Fancycache. lol
http://www.romexsoftware.com/en-us/fancy-cache/

Don't be too put off by the beta version. It's been out for nearly a year and they have listened to testers and many new features have been implemented as a result. Back up your data of course but it does work. People running VM's REALLY love it.