The Hardcard
Senior member
Using less watts as well.It should be big enough that mobile U9 H SKU unified core will be over 5500 ST in GB6.x
That is what I’m expecting as it’s a 2028/early 2029 product.
Using less watts as well.It should be big enough that mobile U9 H SKU unified core will be over 5500 ST in GB6.x
That is what I’m expecting as it’s a 2028/early 2029 product.
Which software factor? LLVM?I am pretty sure the software Factor is powered by Intel 🙂
most of the software libraries for example even Geekbench uses TBB. Cinebench uses one of Intels rendering libraries.Which software factor? LLVM?
So is Embree still part of Redshift or was it dropped along the way? Or is Redshift used for GPU only in Cinebench and CPU path, while improved, does still stick to Embree?most of the software libraries for example even Geekbench uses TBB. Cinebench uses one of Intels rendering libraries.
Embree is still part of the CPU path afaik no idea in regards to GPUSo is Embree still part of Redshift or was it dropped along the way? Or is Redshift used for GPU only in Cinebench and CPU path, while improved, does still stick to Embree?
Nope Titan is indeed Unified otherwise it won't be getting Cooper Shark the core code name is different from Project code name just like for Royal Core the core had a different codenameView attachment 141807hmm? No unified core till 29'?
TTL reuses RZL CPUs.Nope Titan is indeed Unified otherwise it won't be getting Cooper Shark the core code name is different from Project code name just like for Royal Core the core had a different codename
TTL : Copper Shark P + Golden Eagle ETTL reuses RZL CPUs.
Hammer Lake is the first UC part.
No, Hammer Lake is that.TTL : Copper Shark P + Golden Eagle E
RZL : Griffin Cove P + Golden Eagle E
Uhhh Nope Jaykhin confirmed thatNo, Hammer Lake is that.
TTL is the SOC update.
Uhh they can launch a PTL 12Xe part relatively easily though nothing is stopping them except themselves on 1851Let's go with the truth of the above discussion regarding RZL/TTL/HML core IP being both right and wrong at the same time 😉 Part of the reason for such is that Intel's starting to make proper use of their tiled design approach to mix and match IPs to better address market demands/timelines. (eg, see the recent rumor of a socketed NVL+12Xe part.)
If Intel had decided to develop and release the desktop variant of PTL then this would be the case.Uhh they can launch a PTL 12Xe part relatively easily though nothing is stopping them except themselves on 1851
If Intel had decided to develop and release the desktop variant of PTL then this would be the case.
Copper shark is P and Golden Eagle is ESo Copper Shark is an E-Core, looks like. I think we may be confused by the Golden Eagle thing - is THAT a P-Core or E-Core? And from which generation? Possibly the old table that assigned it to Razor Lake was wrong?
That's a charitable way of putting it. 18AP should improve things a bit, maybe. Then 18A(P) will look different.18A sounds like an efficiency node.
DMR 600WCan 18A handle high power CPU's? Isn't NVL using 2N for those types of parts? 18A sounds like an efficiency node.
Yes lolCan 18A handle high power CPU's? Isn't NVL using 2N for those types of parts? 18A sounds like an efficiency node.
Yes lol