• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Integrated Chipsets- Which would you use?

DDad

Golden Member
Building a couple of business boxes and I'm looking to use some of the integrated Asus socket A boards. The A7S-VM uses the Sis 730s chipset, the A7VL-VM uses the KL-133 (Pro Savage).

Other than that, kind of hard to tell the difference. Which way would you go and why?
 
Honestly? i810e
Anandtech did a rather deep review and saw that the performace between a celeron and a duron in an intergated enviornment was very slight. You could even use a cheap P3.

bart
 
In that case, mabey just use cheap TNT2-M64 cards?

not many of us around here have bought or bothered with intergrated setups.

bart
 
The image quality on the i810/i815 are pretty much crap. Blurry at resolutions greater than 800x600. And don't expect text to be crispy clear at 85hz.

Since these are probably going to be office app machines, then it will probably be better to get a celeron or duron setup with a matrox G200 or something.
 
I've built a few Duron 750 machines using the Biostar M7VKL KL133 board and they have been pretty impressive machines (for the money). I was a little hesitant at first about the SavagePro graphics, having never seen them, but they look perfectly fine to me. And Duron is much cheaper than Celeron.
 
Back
Top