Insurgents Threaten to use WMD's in Fallujah!!!

Chadder007

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
7,560
0
0
'Insurgents' Threaten to Use WMD in Fallujah

*Note that the 'rebels' a) are led by remnants of Sadam Hussein's Army b) have chemical weapons c) are collaborating with Zarqawi's al Qaeda linked terrorist organization.

The Australian:
AS the US reeled from the death of nine marines in Iraq at the weekend, insurgents in Fallujah claimed to have obtained chemical weapons and threatened to use them in any battle for control of the rebel stronghold.

Rebel commanders said chemicals such as cyanide had been added to mortar rounds and missiles that would be deployed against coalition troops reported to be preparing for a major assault on the town west of Baghdad.

A military committee made up of former officers in Saddam Hussein's army, including experts on chemicals and guerrilla warfare, is said to have been organising forces in Fallujah and planning tactics.

The committee is understood to include members of all the main insurgent groups, including that of Iraq's most wanted man, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist leader behind the beheading of several foreign hostages and a string of car-bomb attacks.


http://www.theaustralian.news....47879%255E2703,00.html
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
God help us if that happens.

In the first Gulf War, President Bush threatened to use nuclear weapons against Iraq if they used chemical/biological weapons against us. The problem now, of course, is that we are fighting an insurgency in what purports to be a nation friendly to the US (at least its interim government is), and we can't very well pollute it, and incur potentially massive civilian casualties, by doing something like that. I honestly don't know what we'd do, but I imagine there would be very little left of Fallujah within a couple of days.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

 

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
How does adding cyanide to morter rounds make them WMDs? Sounds like the FUD is getting a little thick.
 

Tylanner

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2004
5,481
2
81
".....America is privileged to spend her blood and her might for the principles that gave her birth and happiness and the peace which she has treasured."

This war could get worse really fast :/
 

351Cleveland

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2001
1,381
6
81
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

And made an alliance between Saddam's men and Al Qaeda... uh huh...

You took the BLUE pill didnt you?

 

Tylanner

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2004
5,481
2
81
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

And made an alliance between Saddam's men and Al Qaeda... uh huh...

You took the BLUE pill didnt you?



Blame gets assigned quite freely here.

Well this is, after all, a opinionated forum.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

And made an alliance between Saddam's men and Al Qaeda... uh huh...

You took the BLUE pill didnt you?

Am I wrong? Or do you just want to quip?
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

LOL.. Yep, I saw Bush fly them in himself.. You guys have excuses for everything.. If they find WMD's, its because Bush causes them to be there, if they didn't, its because Bush lied.. If they were there, and the insurgents got them, its because Bush didn't protect them properly.

Its nice to take every side of every issue.. Oh wait, thats what Kerry has done for the whole election.
 

BarneyFife

Diamond Member
Aug 12, 2001
3,875
0
76
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

LOL.. Yep, I saw Bush fly them in himself.. You guys have excuses for everything.. If they find WMD's, its because Bush causes them to be there, if they didn't, its because Bush lied.. If they were there, and the insurgents got them, its because Bush didn't protect them properly.

Its nice to take every side of every issue.. Oh wait, thats what Kerry has done for the whole election.

It must also be nice parading around as a Christian and killing innocent people.

 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

LOL.. Yep, I saw Bush fly them in himself.. You guys have excuses for everything.. If they find WMD's, its because Bush causes them to be there, if they didn't, its because Bush lied.. If they were there, and the insurgents got them, its because Bush didn't protect them properly.

Its nice to take every side of every issue.. Oh wait, thats what Kerry has done for the whole election.

It must also be nice parading around as a Christian and killing innocent people.

But its just A-OK to have someone like Hussein do it right? As long as Hussein doesn't 'claim' to be a religious man, who gives a rip how much he kills.. The Christian hate here continues.. nothing but excuses for the Muslims, but, those Christians.. EVIL!
 

351Cleveland

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2001
1,381
6
81
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: 351Cleveland
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

And made an alliance between Saddam's men and Al Qaeda... uh huh...

You took the BLUE pill didnt you?

Am I wrong? Or do you just want to quip?

I think you are wrong. Sorry. Thought that was obvious from my previous post.
 

351Cleveland

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2001
1,381
6
81
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

LOL.. Yep, I saw Bush fly them in himself.. You guys have excuses for everything.. If they find WMD's, its because Bush causes them to be there, if they didn't, its because Bush lied.. If they were there, and the insurgents got them, its because Bush didn't protect them properly.

Its nice to take every side of every issue.. Oh wait, thats what Kerry has done for the whole election.

It must also be nice parading around as a Christian and killing innocent people.

*laughs and points at the funny clown*

You are so silly...
 

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
Nobody cares that calling these morter shells WMDs is BS? Even calling them chemical weapons is the same as feces on punji sticks being biological warfare. Has everyone heard so much BS lately that it dosen't bother them anymore? Is creating FUD so commonplace that it has become not worth noting? I guess I know how we got here, but where are we?
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

LOL. Man Please. If they had them no doubt they would have used them by now. And Bush approved this story.
 

AndrewP

Junior Member
Nov 2, 2004
1
0
0
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
Nobody cares that calling these morter shells WMDs is BS? Even calling them chemical weapons is the same as feces on punji sticks being biological warfare. Has everyone heard so much BS lately that it dosen't bother them anymore? Is creating FUD so commonplace that it has become not worth noting? I guess I know how we got here, but where are we?



You are right in your accusation that this is not a WMD. However, it is a chemical weapon that i would not like to see people die of. Refer to
http://www.totse.com/en/bad_id..._weapons/cwhcinfo.html
for more detail. Especially the first paragraph.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
Nobody cares that calling these morter shells WMDs is BS? Even calling them chemical weapons is the same as feces on punji sticks being biological warfare. Has everyone heard so much BS lately that it dosen't bother them anymore? Is creating FUD so commonplace that it has become not worth noting? I guess I know how we got here, but where are we?

WMDs, by their very name, must cause MASS DESTRUCTION. These chemical weapons are bad, but they aren't WMDs as far as I can tell.
 

ReiAyanami

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2002
4,466
0
0
wow, bush is a uniter, of our enemies against us. he said iraq had al aqaida ties, so he brought them together. he said iraq had WMD, so now they do.

giving them access to 700,000 lbs IAEA grade explosives, and $500 million of saddam's corporate bling, they can now afford to buy rogue russian nukes and now have the explosives to detonate them.
 

konichiwa

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,077
2
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Infohawk
If that's true it sounds like Bush has been successful at bringing wmds to iraq where there were none before.

LOL.. Yep, I saw Bush fly them in himself.. You guys have excuses for everything.. If they find WMD's, its because Bush causes them to be there, if they didn't, its because Bush lied.. If they were there, and the insurgents got them, its because Bush didn't protect them properly.

Its nice to take every side of every issue.. Oh wait, thats what Kerry has done for the whole election.

Listen, there were no WMD's found in Iraq for months and months after the invasion, after administration officials as well as people on THIS board kept saying "just wait, they'll show up," etc, etc.

Then the report is issued saying there was never evidence of WMD but the level of violence/terrorism and the number of terrorists in Iraq has INCREASED since the invasion. If anyone is claiming to plan to use WMD, odds are it's someone who's brought them in since the invasion BECAUSE we are there...
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
I thought this war was supposed to prevent WMD's falling into hands of terrorists? If this story is true:
Failure Accomplished.
 

Mean MrMustard

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2001
3,144
10
81
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I thought this war was supposed to prevent WMD's falling into hands of terrorists? If this story is true:
Failure Accomplished.

Sadly, this would mean the ULTIMATE FAILURE of the Bush Reg... huh... Administration on the WOT. But it would probably give them more votes.