FallenHero
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2006
- 5,659
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Entitlement. :roll:Originally posted by: thesurge
so uh what's the limit? two weeks of false imprisonment? one month? a year? how long before she's entitled to money.
This wasn't a malicious act against her. It was life. She'll get over it.
You don't have to be malicious to be successfully sued. You have to be found NEGLIGENT! I think it's pretty clear that they were negligent in performing their duty. I say she should get $30-40k. 17 year old girls should not be thrown in adult jails because of an unclear photo and no fvcking name attached to it.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
It's not like the cops had a vendetta against her and threw her in jail because they thought she was a loser. She was identified by a witness as part of a robbery. It wasn't a conspiracy.Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
She was 17. Yeah, I guess give her min wage for a week if she actually had a part-time job. When I was 17 and it was November, I was a high school senior with too many extracurricular activities to have a job.
So let's see 20 hours (OK we'll be nice, 30 hours) at what is it, $5.35 per hour? And then there's taxes....
Gahhhh. I'm so sick of people filing lawsuits.
While I agree that there are many frivolous lawsuits, FALSE IMPRISONMENT is a valid cause for one.
The cops had cause. The cops did what they were supposed to do. And things wound up working the way they were supposed to. It's all part of this thing called life.
I certainly hope you don't think we should pay her for her time away from Myspace or text messaging if she wasn't employed right?
yes they should.
she spent a week in jail. that is pretty traumitizing. how much or little she made should not matter.
Basically, you're saying that anyone who is arrested should be released if they can find just one other person to provide an alibi. Oh, yeah, that'll work great.Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
It's not like the cops had a vendetta against her and threw her in jail because they thought she was a loser. She was identified by a witness as part of a robbery. It wasn't a conspiracy.Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
She was 17. Yeah, I guess give her min wage for a week if she actually had a part-time job. When I was 17 and it was November, I was a high school senior with too many extracurricular activities to have a job.
So let's see 20 hours (OK we'll be nice, 30 hours) at what is it, $5.35 per hour? And then there's taxes....
Gahhhh. I'm so sick of people filing lawsuits.
While I agree that there are many frivolous lawsuits, FALSE IMPRISONMENT is a valid cause for one.
The cops had cause. The cops did what they were supposed to do. And things wound up working the way they were supposed to. It's all part of this thing called life.
I certainly hope you don't think we should pay her for her time away from Myspace or text messaging if she wasn't employed right?
yes they should.
she spent a week in jail. that is pretty traumitizing. how much or little she made should not matter.
Aside from the part that she LOST A WEEK OF HER LIFE, and despite the fact that she was cleared of charge and the police admitted a mistake, she is going to get a negative public reaction from it. People will give her crap about it and there might be people that will refuse to believe she isn't a criminal.
Even a positive ID from a witness requires some looking into, and from the sound of it, and I doubt there wasn't another single person in the world that was with her at the time the robbery took place. If a person can attest to the fact that she was with them at the time, then why should either witness be weighed more than the other?
