Influx of black renters raises tension in Bay Area

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
40k a year isnt poor..not rich..,but sure as hell not poor

For a family of 4 or 5? I know it's not poverty, but it sure ain't middle-class.

ZV
 

ultra laser

Banned
Jul 2, 2007
513
0
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
40k a year isnt poor..not rich..,but sure as hell not poor

For a family of 4 or 5? I know it's not poverty, but it sure ain't middle-class.

ZV

People who can't afford children shouldn't have them.
 

ultra laser

Banned
Jul 2, 2007
513
0
0
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

Nobody wants to live near the urban poor who behave badly. You do know that white crack addicts aren't good neighbors either?

I have a solution for you: reduce poverty among the poor blacks, and watch the problems drop.

Oh, I know, you can't be bothered.

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren." Until you do so, the fact remains: nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.
 

mxyzptlk

Golden Member
Apr 18, 2008
1,888
0
0
Originally posted by: ultra laser

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren."

So you honestly believe that everything else being equal, a wealthy, black person is somehow more inclined towards mugging school-aged children while a poor, white person isn't?

Well, Fuck you too.

If there's any group of people that anyone should want to avoid living around, it's people who go by the online handle, "ultra laser"
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,563
14,967
146
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

Nobody wants to live near the urban poor who behave badly. You do know that white crack addicts aren't good neighbors either?

I have a solution for you: reduce poverty among the poor blacks, and watch the problems drop.

Oh, I know, you can't be bothered.

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren." Until you do so, the fact remains: nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.



Dude...if you hate Black people so much, why do you use one for your avatar? :p
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

Nobody wants to live near the urban poor who behave badly. You do know that white crack addicts aren't good neighbors either?

I have a solution for you: reduce poverty among the poor blacks, and watch the problems drop.

Oh, I know, you can't be bothered.

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren." Until you do so, the fact remains: nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

My next door neighbors are black. They lived next door prior to me moving in. One's a school teacher and the one next door is a surgeon. A block away is a housing project. Never had an issue with any of them. So, you're wrong.
 

Pneumothorax

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2002
1,182
23
81
I can definitely identify with the people from Antioch as my fiance has a house in Victorville, CA which is out in the middle of the southern cal boondocks. Over the last 2 years her neighborhood has been converted to about 50% section 8 as more and more people move out. Her neighborhood was once covered in green lush lawns, now half of the lawns are dead with cars parked on top of them. We also don't stay in her house that much anymore due to the 3am parties and kids walking around at night. In fact day after christmas there was a drive-by a block away that woke us up along with the requisite squad cars and searchlights that followed. She's lived in this house for over 10 years and the sudden influx of section 8'ers had a huge impact on the neighborhood. BTW, we're thinking about just walking away from that house as it's really hard to sell when prospective buyers see the 'hood on the way to the house.

The quickest way to improve this problem would be to get rid of the 2/3rd subsidizing. Simple fact of human nature: You don't appreciate what was given to you for free. To the guy from Mass who loves section 8, I'm pretty sure the demographics and culture of the people from the NE is quite different from So-cal when most of the transplants are coming from Compton/Watts area.
 

yowolabi

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,183
2
81
Originally posted by: GoPackGo
Originally posted by: dennilfloss
Looks to me like their beef isn't with the fact that the people are black but with

loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren

I'm sure they'd dislike it just as much if the miscreants were blue-eyed platinum-blonde 'aryans' or scottish redheads.

Its the behavior I hate. The behavior is tolerated it seems more due to skin color.
When someone trys to address the behavior the race card is played EVERY TIME.

Really? Who's tolerating it? Not only are the police not saying "nothing to see here, the kid was mugged by a Black", but they even formed a special squad.

Where did race enter into this story?


Originally posted by: ultra laser

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren." Until you do so, the fact remains: nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

You're full of shit. Maybe the racists don't want to live near blacks, but you seem to think there's more of them than I do. All of the rest of the people, including law-abiding black people, don't have any problem living near other Black people. They don't want to live near criminals or bad neigbors, no matter what the color.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Dude...if you hate Black people so much, why do you use one for your avatar? :p

Man racism is insane. Is that funny to you?
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

Nobody wants to live near the urban poor who behave badly. You do know that white crack addicts aren't good neighbors either?

I have a solution for you: reduce poverty among the poor blacks, and watch the problems drop.

Oh, I know, you can't be bothered.

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren." Until you do so, the fact remains: nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

The bold would have been exactly true had you just substituted poor for blacks for the bolded...although, I suppose if you lived in an area where really only the black people were poor it would be true. But that would be a coincidence rather than a condemation of black people in general...

Chuck
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
I can definitely identify with the people from Antioch as my fiance has a house in Victorville, CA which is out in the middle of the southern cal boondocks. Over the last 2 years her neighborhood has been converted to about 50% section 8 as more and more people move out. Her neighborhood was once covered in green lush lawns, now half of the lawns are dead with cars parked on top of them. We also don't stay in her house that much anymore due to the 3am parties and kids walking around at night. In fact day after christmas there was a drive-by a block away that woke us up along with the requisite squad cars and searchlights that followed. She's lived in this house for over 10 years and the sudden influx of section 8'ers had a huge impact on the neighborhood. BTW, we're thinking about just walking away from that house as it's really hard to sell when prospective buyers see the 'hood on the way to the house.

The quickest way to improve this problem would be to get rid of the 2/3rd subsidizing. Simple fact of human nature: You don't appreciate what was given to you for free. To the guy from Mass who loves section 8, I'm pretty sure the demographics and culture of the people from the NE is quite different from So-cal when most of the transplants are coming from Compton/Watts area.


Good to hear from someone with first hand experience living with section 8 instead of others telling us it's paradise there.
 

Grouchyoldguy

Senior member
Jun 4, 2003
327
0
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: TheRedUnderURBed
Originally posted by: Specop 007


Influx of black renters raises tension in Bay Area

Antioch is hardly the Bay Area, it is way out in the hardcore republican meth addled central valley way past where the furthest BART trains go. No surprise there, you might as well be talking about Tennessee.
Desperate much?
They will adjust, diversity tends to destroy the ignorance of racism regardless of what this poster is trying to tell people.

Pittsburg and Antioch are loosely considered part of the East Bay, as is Concord and Walnut Creek...even though they're quite a way from the Bay itself.

This thread might as well be complaining about how when the BART extends, crime goes with it because the hooligans have easy and fast transportation in/out of areas.

Sure, Section 8 housing can bring crime problems, but not all po-folks are crooks.



Originally posted by: Ryan711
Just wait until the mexicans start moving up there in droves. I bet they'll want to start securing the border then.



I've spent a lot of years working in and around the bay. SOME predominantly black neighborhoods are horrible...while others aren't much different than any other working-class neighborhood. Pittsburg's Bay Point is known as Gun Point for a good reason...


Bay Point used to be Shore Acres. The rep was so bad they changed the name. It is still a shithole no matter what it's called. Antioch was never all that great either but when the houses went up along Hillcrest the push for a town
more attractive to higher income began. Better freeways, Bart extension, shopping malls, lower crime rates, etc. The city isn't trying to run off black people, it's trying to run off criminals of any color, race and so forth.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,563
14,967
146
Originally posted by: Grouchyoldguy

Bay Point used to be Shore Acres. The rep was so bad they changed the name. It is still a shithole no matter what it's called. Antioch was never all that great either but when the houses went up along Hillcrest the push for a town
more attractive to higher income began. Better freeways, Bart extension, shopping malls, lower crime rates, etc. The city isn't trying to run off black people, it's trying to run off criminals of any color, race and so forth.

We did a pipeline job through some of the neighborhoods...near Bailey Rd north of Hwy 4...don't remember exactly the streets.
The few old-timers there who weren't afraid to come out of their houses talked about the high crime rate.."It so dammed bad, they steal the tires off your car while you drive down the street!"
Hookers and dope dealers on the corners, that kind of stuff.

I worked at USS/POSCO a few times over the years...not a great neighborhood either.




Originally posted by: JSt0rm01
[Man racism is insane. Is that funny to you?

Some of it is...especially when it's as stupid as ultra loser's blatant biggotry.


Besides...you say "Racism" like it's a bad thing...why if it weren't for racism, all those Rednecks wouldn't have anything to watch on Sunday afternoons...:D <vroom...and they're off!>
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,139
236
106
Originally posted by: her209
Pretty soon they'll be attending the white churches and sending their kids to the good white schools.

Hahaha!

The churches couldn't be more happy about that!!! More people to give 5-10 bucks to the plate!

But, I found it funny...

I think section 8 is a scam, anyone want section 8 government assistance? Then they should make one state section 8 state, and move all there asses out there. If were going to spend my tax money on section 8, then I think that it should go to big low end compound buildings that are heavily policed and you have to check in to get there ... means no drugs or weapons... That way they everyone can be safe and get educated with out the gang killings you see today.

 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,942
5,039
136
Originally posted by: ultra loser
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
40k a year isnt poor..not rich..,but sure as hell not poor

For a family of 4 or 5? I know it's not poverty, but it sure ain't middle-class.

ZV

People who can't afford children shouldn't have them.

Good plan.

 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
This is a very complex issue that couldn't be summed up in a post or even a thread.

Some facts, indisputable :

(1)- Violent crime and drug offenses are more common with poorer individuals.

(2)- Violent crime and drug offenses are more common with males.

(3)- Violent crime and drug offenses, on average, are more common with blacks.

(4)- Violent crime and drug offenses, on average, are more common with people under the age of ~35.

Now, taking that into account, you have a bunch of facts that can either fuel racism, fear, or a single-minded view of things, or you can just take it for what it is and try to live your own life accordingly.

IMHO, the two chief problems are poverty and a complete vacuum of culture in the modern youth community. Another chief catalyst is the lack of a functional family unit in many cases. In the 'me' generations, there's no connection to our country, to a sense of duty or identification with the national scene. This is essentially cynicism made into the ethos of our younger generations. Why is it that young black males tend to get into more trouble than other archetypes? I'm leaning towards the creation of an entire counterculture to replace the lack of identification with any other. Never before or anywhere else have I seen it so loftily idealized to be a gang-banging, bitch-slapping, drug-dealing thug. This sounds awfully racist, but it isn't. It's just the truth. Race and genetics have little to do with it. I see plenty of young black men succeed, primarily when they either have a significant role model in their life who rises above the petty bullshit and they pull themselves up as well, or when they just grow up under better circumstances and don't buy into the vapid thug-chic (non) culture. These same traits are common with other troubled but slightly less-common groups, like young hispanic males, or young redneck trailer park males. They simply have a very limited/cynical perspective, and latch onto cheap bullshit instead of formulating a balanced worldview.

Having all of the facts, does it makes sense to fear/hate a particular race due to the very real percentages and statistics that are out there? Not in the least. Does it make sense to take personal action in your life to avoid being victimized by the predators that emerge from every race by practicing common sense? Yes.

The real tragedy of the situation is that Americans of all races have countless leaders and role models of real substance to look up to and to formulate a culture and bond with, but our education system, media infrastructure, and disintegrating family bonds (hard to have family time when it takes both parents working full time just to maintain an average existence on average wages), it's hard to see that.

We lose sight of who we are and where we came from, and we lose ourselves in the end.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,876
3,303
136
Originally posted by: Arkaign
you have a bunch of facts that can either fuel racism, fear, or a single-minded view of things, or you can just take it for what it is and try to live your own life accordingly.

or you can realize this is not a racial issue but a cultural issue and that we can all support the only sure solution to the problem, equal education for all.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: Arkaign
you have a bunch of facts that can either fuel racism, fear, or a single-minded view of things, or you can just take it for what it is and try to live your own life accordingly.

or you can realize this is not a racial issue but a cultural issue and that we can all support the only sure solution to the problem, equal education for all.

I'm not sure education alone would solve the problem, though improvements in our education system are of paramount importance. I'm not sure you understood my post. Re-read. I didn't relegate the issue to pure racial levels, I examined many aspects and facets that reflect directly on the problems noted in the article in the OP. My thoughts clearly stated that I believe our national cultural void is a chief incendiary towards systemic problems.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ultra laser
Nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

Nobody wants to live near the urban poor who behave badly. You do know that white crack addicts aren't good neighbors either?

I have a solution for you: reduce poverty among the poor blacks, and watch the problems drop.

Oh, I know, you can't be bothered.

You need to prove that lack of money leads to "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren." Until you do so, the fact remains: nobody wants to live near blacks, not even blacks.

You need to prove that all blacks have "loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren."

Until you do so, the fact remains: few people want to live near those things, which is not because of the race of the people, but the obnoxiousness of the acts.

And your reading comprhension is lacking - I said the urban poor *who behave badly*, not that all of them behave badly.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
This is a very complex issue that couldn't be summed up in a post or even a thread.

Some facts, indisputable :

(1)- Violent crime and drug offenses are more common with poorer individuals.

(2)- Violent crime and drug offenses are more common with males.

(3)- Violent crime and drug offenses, on average, are more common with blacks.

(4)- Violent crime and drug offenses, on average, are more common with people under the age of ~35.

Now, taking that into account, you have a bunch of facts that can either fuel racism, fear, or a single-minded view of things, or you can just take it for what it is and try to live your own life accordingly.

Or, you can commit yourself to social policies which improve the situation for the poor and reduce the related problems.

Having all of the facts, does it makes sense to fear/hate a particular race due to the very real percentages and statistics that are out there? Not in the least. Does it make sense to take personal action in your life to avoid being victimized by the predators that emerge from every race by practicing common sense? Yes.

Does it make sense to choose policies that reduce poverty and the correlated problems? Yes.

Do many short-sighted wealthy people prefer propagandizing the public to oppose those policies, especially if it impacts things like their supply of cheap labor? Yes.

We lose sight of who we are and where we came from, and we lose ourselves in the end.

For all the thousands of posts by some people expressing how important the biblical values are to them on gay marriage, I see very few from them about its value against poverty.

The fact is that most people have some sense of concern about poverty, but too many let themselves be sold on the lies the powerful are all too happy to provide with perverse messages about how efforts to reduce poverty are actually harmful and such. 'Whew', with a sigh of relief, they can say how they're anti-poverty, and oppose the programs that would help reduce poverty. They get 'moral credit' for concer while not actually supporting any real solutions. That's tragic too.

Those sorts of myths are incredibly damaging. If someone has moral concerns come up about the killing in Vietnam, a myth about how we're actually saving lives by stopping communist expansion lets people ignore the issue. If Someone has concerns we don't invest enough in education, a myth that any additional money spent wouldn't help and would only go to the bureacrats lets people ignore the issue.

John Kennedy said:

The greatest enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, pervasive and unrealistic.
- John F. Kennedy, Yale University, June 11, 1962
 

LumbergTech

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2005
3,622
1
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
40k a year isnt poor..not rich..,but sure as hell not poor

For a family of 4 or 5? I know it's not poverty, but it sure ain't middle-class.

ZV

well my family currently has 3 members..

we can get by on 1500-1700 a month (less if you want to get technical , but i raised the number a little)

20,400 a year

lets add an additional 500 dollars a month for rent because California is expensive..

26,400

now i divide that number by the number of people in the family and add it back to the total to account for a 4th person

35112

so for 5 people..40k wouldnt be enough (although it could be done)

but for 4 people its ok at least..

i dunno, not everyone on the planet can expect to make 60k+ takehome

it just isnt how the world works

 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
If you are a family of 4 making $35k a year, at least in the large metro areas, you are poor...and if you don't consider that poor, then for d@mn sure you are at the absolute lowest boundary of middle class.

For a single person, $35k a year in the Chicagoland area gets you a tiny appt., either a cr@ppy new car/definitely well used decent one, and not much financial freedom. You either need to be splitting rent/everything else with someone, or, live very frugaly.

Chuck
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
44
91
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
40k a year isnt poor..not rich..,but sure as hell not poor

For a family of 4 or 5? I know it's not poverty, but it sure ain't middle-class.

ZV

well my family currently has 3 members..

we can get by on 1500-1700 a month (less if you want to get technical , but i raised the number a little)

20,400 a year

lets add an additional 500 dollars a month for rent because California is expensive..

26,400

now i divide that number by the number of people in the family and add it back to the total to account for a 4th person

35112

so for 5 people..40k wouldnt be enough (although it could be done)

but for 4 people its ok at least..

i dunno, not everyone on the planet can expect to make 60k+ takehome

it just isnt how the world works

Who said anything about take-home pay? When I said $40,000, I meant earning $40,000 before taxes.

Also, who said anything about everyone making $60,000+ in take-home pay? That's a complete non-sequitur. I fully agree that it's possible to live frugally and raise a family on $40,000 (or sometimes even less) in pre-tax income. That doesn't make that family "middle class". Being "poor" doesn't mean that basic needs are not met, it merely means that one cannot afford having a significant savings.

By your math, a family of 4 making $40,000/year in pre-tax income would be living paycheck to paycheck with no substantial savings. Being "middle-class" entails having the ability to save a decent amount of one's income as well as having some amount of discretionary income, neither of which is easily achieved by a family of 4 with only $40,000 of pre-tax income.

ZV
 

tenthumbs

Senior member
Oct 18, 2005
315
2
81
Originally posted by: Grouchyoldguy
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: TheRedUnderURBed
Originally posted by: Specop 007


Influx of black renters raises tension in Bay Area

Antioch is hardly the Bay Area, it is way out in the hardcore republican meth addled central valley way past where the furthest BART trains go. No surprise there, you might as well be talking about Tennessee.
Desperate much?
They will adjust, diversity tends to destroy the ignorance of racism regardless of what this poster is trying to tell people.

Pittsburg and Antioch are loosely considered part of the East Bay, as is Concord and Walnut Creek...even though they're quite a way from the Bay itself.

This thread might as well be complaining about how when the BART extends, crime goes with it because the hooligans have easy and fast transportation in/out of areas.

Sure, Section 8 housing can bring crime problems, but not all po-folks are crooks.



Originally posted by: Ryan711
Just wait until the mexicans start moving up there in droves. I bet they'll want to start securing the border then.



I've spent a lot of years working in and around the bay. SOME predominantly black neighborhoods are horrible...while others aren't much different than any other working-class neighborhood. Pittsburg's Bay Point is known as Gun Point for a good reason...


Bay Point used to be Shore Acres. The rep was so bad they changed the name. It is still a shithole no matter what it's called. Antioch was never all that great either but when the houses went up along Hillcrest the push for a town
more attractive to higher income began. Better freeways, Bart extension, shopping malls, lower crime rates, etc. The city isn't trying to run off black people, it's trying to run off criminals of any color, race and so forth.

What you say about Antioch is very true. There are a lot of people, black and white, trying to maintain Antioch as a good family community.

BTW...Bay Point used to be West Pittsburg, not Shore Acres. Shore Acres is in between Bay Point and Port Chicago. You are right that the name was changed because of the horrible reputation of the city. Pittsburg isn't much better frankly but that's another topic.