Infiltrator demo

[Phynaz]

Epic says this will run real time on a GTX 680

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dO2rM-l-vdQ

 

[VulgarDisplay]

That's the most underwhelming next gen engine video I've seen. The stuff from "deep down" and BF4 both look better. Maybe it's just because I hate Epic's art style.

 

[alcoholbob]

GTX 680? At what, 1 frame per second?

 

[Final8ty]

GTX 680? At what, 1 frame per second?

30

But they should release the exe,s to these.

 

[aaksheytalwar]

No way in hell a 690 could manage that at 30 fps

 

[VulgarDisplay]

Why is this so impressive to everyone? I see a corridor shooter on rails with half decent lighting and sub par animations.

 

[BallaTheFeared]

DreadlockFX - Eat your heart out Lara.

 

[alcoholbob]

Why is this so impressive to everyone? I see a corridor shooter on rails with half decent lighting and sub par animations.

Probably because the fastest gaming hardware on the planet can barely run stuff that in real time that looks 1/10 as good as what's on that video.

 

[Ibra]

VulgarDisplay is so AMD's lunatic. :| UE4 gives CGI quality to actual gameplay while BF4 looks like BF3.

 

[NTMBK]

VulgarDisplay is so AMD's lunatic. :| UE4 gives CGI quality to actual gameplay while BF4 looks like BF3.

Tech demo != actual gameplay.

 

[VulgarDisplay]

VulgarDisplay is so AMD's lunatic. :| UE4 gives CGI quality to actual gameplay while BF4 looks like BF3.

What does amd have to do with this demo not looking good? They could be running this on a calculator for all I care, it doesn't look as good as deep down or many other demo's we have seen lately.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbFBEjlKtpY

This looks way better if you ask me.

 

[notty22]

The demo has caused some comment controversy. It was stated UE4 would not support the Wii U, and not the older sony/microsoft consoles. They weren't next gen.
Unreal Engine 4, Frostbite 3 Will Not Support Wii U



The story is updated to, a developer could make the engine work in other consoles.

 

[SolMiester]

What does amd have to do with this demo not looking good? They could be running this on a calculator for all I care, it doesn't look as good as deep down or many other demo's we have seen lately.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbFBEjlKtpY

This looks way better if you ask me.

Yes, I agree Deep Down does look better, but I still think the Unreal 4 game looks very good...<shrug>

 

[parvadomus]

It looks nice 🙂

 

[VulgarDisplay]

Yes, I agree Deep Down does look better, but I still think the Unreal 4 game looks very good...<shrug>

In the deep down video 5-17 seconds looks better than the entire infiltrator video and it only gets more impressive as it goes.

Also, not only does Deep Down look better but I'm almost positive it's actual game play. Infiltrator is a cut-scene designed to show off UE4, and it looks worse than game play of another engine. I'm seriously not impressed by UE4 in this video at all.

 

[loccothan]

🙂 Great

 

[Pottuvoi]

I'm seriously not impressed by UE4 in this video at all.

Not even in their custom AA?
For me it looks very stable, certainly above other AA methods which do not use MSAA samples.

 

[Anarchist420]

That's the most underwhelming next gen engine video I've seen.

I didn't see what was so special about it either.