Indiana Jones is back.

[mzkhadir]

New Old Indiana Jones

 

[Kirby64]

It's already been posted that Indiana Jones 4 is coming out in 2008, however not in the Indiana Jones website... does this qualify as a repost?

 

[mzkhadir]

Originally posted by: Kirby64
It's already been posted that Indiana Jones 4 is coming out in 2008, however not in the Indiana Jones website... does this qualify as a repost?

but this is a new picture of Harrison Ford in the new Indy movie

 

[ed21x]

he doesn't look bad at all- probably just needs to lose some weight and bulk up a bit,

 

[pulse8]

Super high res anyone?

 

[Fingolfin269]

This better not be to Indy what Godfather 3 was to that series.

 

[Kaido]

That picture looks like a shot from Secondhand Lions, Part 2 :Q

 

[jdini76]

wow. I got chills seeing that. He doesn't look bad at all. Fits right back into place.

 

[maddogchen]

I've had so many false alarms of this, i won't truly believe till i see the preview on a movie screen with my own eyes

 

[foghorn67]

Originally posted by: maddogchen
I've had so many false alarms of this, i won't truly believe till i see the preview on a movie screen with my own eyes

Why? It's in production. Spielberg doesn't get behind the camera on a whim.

 

[lupi]

Story a couple days ago talking about the supporting actor for the film had been picked.

 

[Slick5150]

Originally posted by: lupi
Story a couple days ago talking about the supporting actor for the film had been picked.

Its filming. Of course they've picked the supporting actors, which include Shia LeBeauf, Cate Blanchett, Ray Winstone, and Jim Broadbent (probably the one you're thinking of as it was announced earlier this week)

 

[AnitaPeterson]

Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

 

[elektrolokomotive]

Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

And just think, #3 was orders of magnitude better that Temple of Doom.

 

[jdini76]

Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

I don't know you or anything about you, but now I know I will never listen to your opinion on anything relating to movies. A travesty? come on.

 

[KLin]

That hi res pic is so hi res you can see the "self inflicted whip" scar on his chin. :laugh:

 

[ed21x]

Originally posted by: elektrolokomotive

Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

And just think, #3 was orders of magnitude better that Temple of Doom.

Exactly. I actually liked The Last Crusade more than Raiders of the Lost Ark, but both are head and shoulders above Temple of Doom.

 

[JujuFish]

Originally posted by: ed21x

Originally posted by: elektrolokomotive

Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

And just think, #3 was orders of magnitude better that Temple of Doom.

Exactly. I actually liked The Last Crusade more than Raiders of the Lost Ark, but both are head and shoulders above Temple of Doom.

That is my order of preference as well. The Last Crusade was sweet.

 

[spherrod]

Originally posted by: ed21x

Originally posted by: elektrolokomotive

Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

And just think, #3 was orders of magnitude better that Temple of Doom.

Exactly. I actually liked The Last Crusade more than Raiders of the Lost Ark, but both are head and shoulders above Temple of Doom.

I'd still put Raiders as the best, but Temple of Doom doesn't stand up well against 1 or 3.

 

[austin316]

I would put them #3, #1, #2. Temple of Doom was good, but not great. The first and third were simply classics. The only movie to come close in humor and action in a family friendly movie was the first Pirates. However, numbers 2-3? Not so much.

 

[Fritzo]

Originally posted by: elektrolokomotive

Originally posted by: AnitaPeterson
Better not be a travesty like Indiana Jones 3 was... it was a painful experience.

And just think, #3 was orders of magnitude better that Temple of Doom.

Yeah.. I think he meant #2. #3 was great. Connery's part was a perfect foil for Indiana.

 

[AMCRambler]

Rats! Why did it have to be rats?

 

[CorCentral]

Originally posted by: AMCRambler
Rats! Why did it have to be rats?

Snakes? I HATE SNAKES!

 

[foghorn67]

What's this?

The Ark of the Covenant.

Are you sure?

Pretty sure
(deadpan)

 

[newnameman]

I said NO CAMELS!