CADsortaGUY
Lifer
Well in that case I would take the unilateral right away from the union, but not bar it from occurring entirely which is what this law is aiming to do. Nothing should stop an employer from deciding to only hire from the union, or requiring all employees from paying union dues as part of the contract with the union.
If I was a union worker I would be mighty pissed about legislation barring me from working at a closed shop. That is taking choice away from me.
All this law is doing is adding crap on top of crap. It doesn't make things right, it just makes them different wrong.
What? You still don't understand the legislation or unions if you think this removes a choice. There is ZERO benifit for anyone except the union for a closed shop to exist because it forces people to fall in line under their command and pay dues. Allowing employees the choice of not having to pay dues to something they don't want to be in is much more important than your fake "choice" of a closed shop. sheesh. what a joke.
Again, the EMPLOYER is not the one making the requirement to be in a union, pay dues, or not. Try to keep up...