Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
The very first sentence is bogus.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I make it to be the first sentense, but I don't know why.
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
The very first sentence is bogus.
Which sentence do you consider to be "bogus" and why?
I certainly have no doubt it wasn't up to US standards, but looting and vandalism took most of that infrastructure off line. It didn't just decide to simultaneously break down due to neglect all at once when we got there. But if 'all but ruined' was meant to mean 'working' I guess that statement isn't bogus, just misleading.Iraq's electrical system and other key infrastructure was all but ruined after years of neglect under Saddam Hussein's rule
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
The very first sentence is bogus.
Which sentence do you consider to be "bogus" and why?
I certainly have no doubt it wasn't up to US standards, but looting and vandalism took most of that infrastructure off line. It didn't just decide to simultaneously break down due to neglect all at once when we got there. But if 'all but ruined' was meant to mean 'working' I guess that statement isn't bogus, just misleading.Iraq's electrical system and other key infrastructure was all but ruined after years of neglect under Saddam Hussein's rule
Iraq's electrical system and other key infrastructure was all but ruined after years of neglect under Saddam Hussein's rule, but reconstruction efforts are improving life for the country's citizens with each passing day, U.S. officials in Baghdad said July 7.
Yeah, sure....so all the bombing has nothing to do with the lost of electricity and key infrastrucure?
I certainly have no doubt it wasn't up to US standards, but looting and vandalism took most of that infrastructure off line. It didn't just decide to simultaneously break down due to neglect all at once when we got there. But if 'all but ruined' was meant to mean 'working' I guess that statement isn't bogus, just misleading.
Originally posted by: rchiu
Iraq's electrical system and other key infrastructure was all but ruined after years of neglect under Saddam Hussein's rule, but reconstruction efforts are improving life for the country's citizens with each passing day, U.S. officials in Baghdad said July 7.
Yeah, sure....so all the bombing has nothing to do with the lost of electricity and key infrastrucure?
And is it just me or the article is trying to explain why there is so little progress, rather then showing "incredible progress"?
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
More Equipment and Engineering personell should be sent in or something in order to further expediate the return of essential services. If we dont quicken the pace somewhat with these repairs, then the populace will start to give us more trouble than some parts of it currently are.
Said by a citizen of a country that spends how much on defense?Originally posted by: tcsenter
Its really not open to dispute the atrocious extent to which Hussein allowed Iraq's critical public infrastructures to rot into obsolesence and dilapidation in order to shift resources toward rebuilding his military and constructing what...like 40 palaces? Even the UN and UNICEF agreed that hardships suffered by the Iraqi people during the post-Gulf sanctions was due at least as much to a virtual halt on all manners of public works investment and improvement 10 years before the even Gulf War started.
And for the record, the US did not bomb power "generating" facilities. We bombed power "distribution" infrastructure.
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Its really not open to dispute the atrocious extent to which Hussein allowed Iraq's critical public infrastructures to rot into obsolesence and dilapidation in order to shift resources toward rebuilding his military and constructing what...like 40 palaces? Even the UN and UNICEF agreed that hardships suffered by the Iraqi people during the post-Gulf sanctions was due at least as much to a virtual halt on all manners of public works investment and improvement 10 years before the even Gulf War started.
And for the record, the US did not bomb power "generating" facilities. We bombed power "distribution" infrastructure.
I arrived in Baghdad at night. The city was plunged into darkness. It has been like this for weeks.
"Power cuts are the Americans' greatest failure," the driver told me at the end of the seven-hour long journey through the desert from the Kuwaiti border.
"Electricity, electricity is so important. If they only fixed that," he said with a look of frustration rapidly going over into a resigned expression.
He then added: "You know what, I think they are punishing us because of the continued attacks on their soldiers."
I came across another version of this rumour when I visited a small but burgeoning power generators market on the streets of the old town.
"The Americans," an Iraqi worker in Al-Rashid district told me, "drove around in a Baghdad suburb announcing in a loudspeaker 'security for us in return for electricity for you'".
A later version was even more conspiratorial.
An Iraqi shop owner in A-Karrada district, on the eastern bank of the Tigris, squatted on the pavement outside his shop after giving up hope that his air conditioner would ever work again.
"The Americans are behind the power cuts and the ensuing chaos," he said with a confident tone, "because this will give them a pretext to stay in Iraq for ever."
Temperatures can climb up to 50C in Baghdad during the summer.
This explains why electricity is next only to security for the residents of this city now.
