Originally posted by: MedicBob
I want their job. Think about it, they cal be 100% wrong 100% of the time and get 100% of their pay. What could be better?
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
I think that the old-time weather forecasters were more accurate than today's sorry ass meteorologists.
Back then, they looked at the conditions, then the history, and figured out the precip percentage based on how many times it had ever rained before, when conditions were the same.
Now they try to predict things in real time, and it's amazing how much they are wrong.
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: MedicBob
I want their job. Think about it, they cal be 100% wrong 100% of the time and get 100% of their pay. What could be better?
:beer: Man, I have been saying this for years. What other job can you be consistently wrong ALL the time and bring home an above average salary.
duh.Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
I think that the old-time weather forecasters were more accurate than today's sorry ass meteorologists.
Back then, they looked at the conditions, then the history, and figured out the precip percentage based on how many times it had ever rained before, when conditions were the same.
Now they try to predict things in real time, and it's amazing how much they are wrong.
And how many times do you think they were wrong back in the old-times?
Originally posted by: MedicBob
I want their job. Think about it, they cal be 100% wrong 100% of the time and get 100% of their pay. What could be better?
Less than they are now.....then again, they never make a prediction and stick to it these days. They change the 5 or 7 day forecast thoughout the day now.Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
I think that the old-time weather forecasters were more accurate than today's sorry ass meteorologists.
Back then, they looked at the conditions, then the history, and figured out the precip percentage based on how many times it had ever rained before, when conditions were the same.
Now they try to predict things in real time, and it's amazing how much they are wrong.
And how many times do you think they were wrong back in the old-times?
Sure, like it always is. That didn't stop the weathermen 15-20 years ago from making a forecast and sticking to it, either.Originally posted by: Eli
duh.Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
I think that the old-time weather forecasters were more accurate than today's sorry ass meteorologists.
Back then, they looked at the conditions, then the history, and figured out the precip percentage based on how many times it had ever rained before, when conditions were the same.
Now they try to predict things in real time, and it's amazing how much they are wrong.
And how many times do you think they were wrong back in the old-times?
Hello, people? Sure, experience can play a big role, but you do realize that it is computer models that come up with all the info, right?
They're free to modify it as they see fit, especially depending on the area. For example, many computer models don't take into acount the Columbia River Gorge and the effects it can have on some parts of the Portland metro area.
But still.
If you actually watch, you'll notice that the 7-day forecast often changes every newscast. It just means that the weather is very unstable or simply unpredictable at the moment.
Originally posted by: MacBaine
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: MedicBob
I want their job. Think about it, they cal be 100% wrong 100% of the time and get 100% of their pay. What could be better?
:beer: Man, I have been saying this for years. What other job can you be consistently wrong ALL the time and bring home an above average salary.
You do realize that computers do 99% of their job too?
