In response to some *assertions*....

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: TechJunkie95242
In Cads mine rhetoric against Bush=truth. He just doesn't want to face up to reality so he just ignores it.

Ah yes, a mind reader....how quaint.

CkG

 

[PrinceofWands]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
You know, I'm so tired of the same blind devotees to both sides ignoring arguments from their opposition that I'm about ready to off the pres just to end all debate on him (no, really, that's my only reason, honest). If he ain't livin, he ain't causing grief in P&N.

*sigh* alas, my impecable moral fortitude prevents me from actually doing such a thing (unless he does something MONUMENTALLY anti-American). I can dream though. And learn to ignore these debates.

hmmmm, now that I think about it, with the secret service investigating kids drawing nicolae unflatteringly, this post should definately raise an eyebrow. Oh well.

Just in case anyone missed it the first time. It's her usual gem.

Hey, welcome back. Have a nice ban?

 

[Mean MrMustard]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
CAD you just got PWNED twice, and you have nothing to say to back yourself up. How typical of you to brush off any attacks as if they aren't worth your time when you know your wrong and can't back yourself up with any real facts. I guess it's your defense mechanism or something. I can at least admit when I'm wrong but your apparently too arrogant and cocky to do so. Face it, your boy is a flip-flopper just as much as any politician.

You don't seem to have a clue or know how to read if you think I was "pwned" :roll: conjur provided some links which Junkie did not. Junkie couldn't back up his BS(he posted in a thread that had nothing to do with any of these "issues") and now conjur has to try to cover for him by trying to throw links around. You see, if you had any sense or reading comprehension skills you'd actually READ what I posted to find out my point instead of ASSuming I was arguing the individual points

Now once again - "If you wish to discuss the actual issue - go find the threads that deal with them. If you just wish to practice your rhetoric and partisan accusation slinging - then here is the thread for you to practice those skills in." (quote from OP for those who have reading issues

Okay.

So its okay to start a thread and bring up issues but not okay to refute and/or discuss the issues in the same thread?

Okay, I get it.

 

[TechJunkie95242]

haha i love your signature ELP

 

[Genesys]

Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
What do I have against GWB?
I do not want him and the religious right to choose the next three Supreme Court justices.

The idea of Jerry Falwell and et having the final say on the Supreme Court gives me the willies!

lol, i dont want another immoral democrat president who chooses looney leftists for the supreme court. anyone who values the life of a tree or animal over the life of a human gives me the willies.

 

[Gaard]

Originally posted by: Genesys

Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
What do I have against GWB?
I do not want him and the religious right to choose the next three Supreme Court justices.

The idea of Jerry Falwell and et having the final say on the Supreme Court gives me the willies!

lol, i dont want another immoral democrat president who chooses looney leftists for the supreme court. anyone who values the life of a tree or animal over the life of a human gives me the willies.

Agreed. If only those damn trees and animals would be considerate of others and keep to themselves.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Ldir

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
No, you see - I wasn't denying per se, just stating that those comments are worthless by themselves. You know... The point of this thread A bunch of accusations full of rhetoric put into one giant rant which was stuck in the middle of a thread that had nothing to do with those supposed issues.

Maybe people just understanding things...

I understand CAD-foragainst-kindaGUY got pwned.

:roll: right :roll:

Like I said - I'll be more that happy to address the supposed "issues" junkie ranted about in their appropriate threads. So go ahead and practice your rhetorics and kiddie lingo here I don't mind

CkG

ROFL. Why do so many people poke fun at poor Cad? I think the answer may lie in this song. For some reason, it popped into mind when I read his post. It's not just the title; the lyrics seem oddly appropriate too.

(CAD-foragainst-kindaGUY! I love it. )

YaY - Bow is practicing too! I knew the king of rhetoric would show up again. You are dangerously close to loosing your crown again Bow. Better get to work...

CkG

Cad! I'm hurt. Here I am trying to help you, and you turn on me.


Hitssbitthwaatefe