- Oct 9, 1999
- 72,636
- 47
- 91
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Does their 10/100,000 warranty cover that?![]()
"Prior to the collision, warnings were given to the two vessels by the MPA's vessel traffic information service. The two vessels also communicated with each other," the statement said.
You know how long it takes to stop a ship of that size?Originally posted by: BigSmooth
"Prior to the collision, warnings were given to the two vessels by the MPA's vessel traffic information service. The two vessels also communicated with each other," the statement said.Must not have been a lot of warning if they still hit each other.
Yes, which is why it must not have been "a lot" of warning. If they had sufficient warning, obviously they would have each changed course.Originally posted by: werk
You know how long it takes to stop a ship of that size?Originally posted by: BigSmooth
"Prior to the collision, warnings were given to the two vessels by the MPA's vessel traffic information service. The two vessels also communicated with each other," the statement said.Must not have been a lot of warning if they still hit each other.
Relatively, yes. It probably wasn't a lot of time in regard to the time it takes to change the course of a large vessel. However, in terms of the actual amount of time it was, I'm sure there was plenty of time to receive collision warnings from land and have the 2 ships communicate.Originally posted by: BigSmooth
Yes, which is why it must not have been "a lot" of warning. If they had sufficient warning, obviously they would have each changed course.Originally posted by: werk
You know how long it takes to stop a ship of that size?Originally posted by: BigSmooth
"Prior to the collision, warnings were given to the two vessels by the MPA's vessel traffic information service. The two vessels also communicated with each other," the statement said.Must not have been a lot of warning if they still hit each other.
Right. The "confused" smiley was because the article did not make that clear.Originally posted by: werk
Relatively, yes. It probably wasn't a lot of time in regard to the time it takes to change the course of a large vessel. However, in terms of the actual amount of time it was, I'm sure there was plenty of time to receive collision warnings from land and have the 2 ships communicate.Originally posted by: BigSmooth
Yes, which is why it must not have been "a lot" of warning. If they had sufficient warning, obviously they would have each changed course.Originally posted by: werk
You know how long it takes to stop a ship of that size?Originally posted by: BigSmooth
"Prior to the collision, warnings were given to the two vessels by the MPA's vessel traffic information service. The two vessels also communicated with each other," the statement said.Must not have been a lot of warning if they still hit each other.
Gotcha. :beer:Originally posted by: BigSmooth
Right. The "confused" smiley was because the article did not make that clear.Originally posted by: werk
Relatively, yes. It probably wasn't a lot of time in regard to the time it takes to change the course of a large vessel. However, in terms of the actual amount of time it was, I'm sure there was plenty of time to receive collision warnings from land and have the 2 ships communicate.Originally posted by: BigSmooth
Yes, which is why it must not have been "a lot" of warning. If they had sufficient warning, obviously they would have each changed course.Originally posted by: werk
You know how long it takes to stop a ship of that size?Originally posted by: BigSmooth
"Prior to the collision, warnings were given to the two vessels by the MPA's vessel traffic information service. The two vessels also communicated with each other," the statement said.Must not have been a lot of warning if they still hit each other.
![]()
lolOriginally posted by: richardycc
wow, they might actually post a profitable quarter once they've collected the insurance money.
Originally posted by: dquan97
How much gas is in those cars? Possible environmental danger?