ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 32,200
- 14,873
- 136
Ignorant.
Ignorant implies one is simply unaware, he is aware and chooses to ignore facts, I call that being an idiot.
Ignorant.
I am not in a position to believe random genetic copying mistakes and selection built our brains, 100% correct. Showing a gene duplication isn't going to convince me otherwise or telling fairy tales about eye evolution either.
Now you're lying again. That isn't what I called you incompetent about.Yeah, so apparently linking peer reviewed research papers is giving you lying fluff. How incompetent of me.
You sure seem to be acting the same what as those you ignored.
More questions.:thumbsdown:So, what would? Do you believe ID is as well supported as Evolution?
More questions.:thumbsdown:
Now you're lying again. That isn't what I called you incompetent about.
More questions.:thumbsdown:
Again you misrepresent things. I didn't say you couldn't do simple calculations, at all. I asked, admittedly sarcastically, if your lab required measurements. If you'd quit lying about what was said I wouldn't say you are lying. I'm sure you can do "simple calculations", not a doubt in my mind.No, you called me clueless, incompetent, and a liar. You implied I was not able to do simple calculations when I said I had to do a lab for school. You add those up, and you sure do seem angry toward me.
You seem to be going down a hill. Is everything okay?
What I believe doesn't matter. There is supposed to be mountains of evidence for this theory. A theory where a microbe turns to people, blue whales, and pine trees via random genetic copying errors and selection. Yet, we get gene duplications, fairy tales about eyes, and cells sticking together in support of this preposterous idea. And I have faith?Questions, about what you believe, bother you?
Again you misrepresent things. I didn't say you couldn't do simple calculations, at all. I asked, admittedly sarcastically, if your lab required measurements. If you'd quit lying about what was said I wouldn't say you are lying. I'm sure you can do "simple calculations", not a doubt in my mind.
For scientific lab work, I maintain that you are clueless and incompetent. Nothing wrong with that. It looks to me as if you've never set foot in a lab. You're an econ major which explains a lot about you not having any experience.
What I believe doesn't matter. There is supposed to be mountains of evidence for this theory. A theory where a microbe turns to people, blue whales, and pine trees via random genetic copying errors and selection. Yet, we get gene duplications, fairy tales about eyes, and cells sticking together in support of this preposterous idea. And I have faith?
Not at all, I'm incompetent at brain surgery. I'm incompetent at programming. Nothing wrong with being incompetent in things you've never done.Econ\Finance.
Also, nothing wrong with clueless and incompetent eh.
Measurements aren't "simple calculations". You are wrong again.If you ask sarcastically if my lab has measurements, then you are implying I cannot do them.
If you think measuring things and understanding the limits of those measurements has anything to do with "simple calculations" this further proves you are incompetent.If you want to dance around that its up to you, but you did imply with your question I could not.
You seem to have a problem with the truth. You seem to be upset with me for not accepting your fairy tales.Sliding further and further.
What I believe doesn't matter. There is supposed to be mountains of evidence for this theory. A theory where a microbe turns to people, blue whales, and pine trees via random genetic copying errors and selection. Yet, we get gene duplications, fairy tales about eyes, and cells sticking together in support of this preposterous idea. And I have faith?
Not at all, I'm incompetent at brain surgery. I'm incompetent at programming. Nothing wrong with being incompetent in things you've never done.
Measurements aren't "simple calculations". You are wrong again.
If you think measuring things and understanding the limits of those measurements has anything to do with "simple calculations" this further proves you are incompetent.
You seem to have a problem with the truth. You seem to be upset with me for not accepting your fairy tales.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution
So you are smarter than the vast majority of scientists of almost the last century? Or is it some vast conspiracy? Your attempt to discredit evolution, leaving ID as an alternative, without directly arguing for it, will convince almost no one.
Thankfully, majorities don't determine truth.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution
So you are smarter than the vast majority of scientists of almost the last century? Or is it some vast conspiracy? Your attempt to discredit evolution, leaving ID as an alternative, without directly arguing for it, will convince almost no one.
Which part is the fairy tale?You seem to have a problem with the truth. You seem to be upset with me for not accepting your fairy tales.
How do you explain the widespread acceptance of evolution among peoples of widely differing cultural and religious upbringing?Thankfully, majorities don't determine truth.
How do you explain the widespread acceptance of evolution among peoples of widely differing cultural and religious upbringing?
Who knows, but that doesn't make mutation and selection any more able to produce the results you think it can achieve.How do you explain the widespread acceptance of evolution among peoples of widely differing cultural and religious upbringing?
Thankfully, majorities don't determine truth.
Bullshit non-answer. The widespread acceptance of evolution is a phenomenon that demands explanation -- particularly if you are to suggest that it is a "fairy tale."Who knows
...but that doesn't make mutation and selection any more able to produce the results you think it can achieve.
Here are some reasons why the FSM doesn't exist.
3. NOBODY believes it exists.
Thankfully, majorities don't determine truth.
Hey buckshot, prove the FSM doesn't exist.
Hey buckshot, the overwhelming majority of scientists accept evolution.
lol.