- Jul 11, 2001
- 40,410
- 9,932
- 136
Are these optional add-ons a good idea? I asked at Mazda 626 forums, and the tone was negative: http://mazda626.net/topic/42734-suggest-inline-filter-for-626-transmission/"]http://mazda626.net/topic/42734-suggest-inline-filter-for-626-transmission/. However, the A-Team (who presumably know more about my car than anyone, a Mazda 1997 626LX 2.0L ATX) evidently favor them.
In that thread a moderator responded that "I dont see a inline filter having enough surface area to really help. And it would clog up pretty quickly."
I'm wondering if that's just him, though, what he does. At Amazon, some of those filters get good reviews, saw one that people said was failing, and could cause transmission failure due to leaks, and/or just falling apart!
I figure maybe if I replace the in-line filter every 12000 miles or so at the same time I replace fluid it will really help. The filter in my transmission (CD4E transmission) isn't easily replaced and the dealership who flushed my trany a few weeks ago didn't replace it... they didn't even admit it existed! They actually claimed that the trany filter in my car had been phased out.
In that thread a moderator responded that "I dont see a inline filter having enough surface area to really help. And it would clog up pretty quickly."
I'm wondering if that's just him, though, what he does. At Amazon, some of those filters get good reviews, saw one that people said was failing, and could cause transmission failure due to leaks, and/or just falling apart!
I figure maybe if I replace the in-line filter every 12000 miles or so at the same time I replace fluid it will really help. The filter in my transmission (CD4E transmission) isn't easily replaced and the dealership who flushed my trany a few weeks ago didn't replace it... they didn't even admit it existed! They actually claimed that the trany filter in my car had been phased out.
Last edited: