In C&C Generals, what are you supposed to do to pass GLA 5????

[Techie333]

I have been playing the GLA Campaign and so far so good, but in Mission 5 after I kill all the americans, it wonts say victory! It just keeps going on and on. Aren't you just supposed to destroy all american forces thus taking back your bunkers???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[dighn]

can you describe iti a bit more i might remember

 

[PoPPeR]

killing americans! Traitor! j/k

I never even played a mission, I only did skirmishes... sorry

gamefaqs is your friend

 

[Techie333]

Originally posted by: dighn
can you describe iti a bit more i might remember

You are supposed to take back your bunkers in an effort to gain control..........this is after you hit up the small towns for the U.N. rations and money.....

 

[carrotunderscorecarrot]

capture 4 bunkers with your rebels.

 

[dighn]

Originally posted by: carrotunderscorecarrot
capture 4 bunkers with your rebels.

oh you actually have to research capture with your barracks, then use the "capture" command on the troops to capture the bunkers




i played all 3 sides

 

[Techie333]

Originally posted by: dighn

Originally posted by: carrotunderscorecarrot
capture 4 bunkers with your rebels.

oh you actually have to research capture with your barracks, then use the "capture" command on the troops to capture the bunkers




i played all 3 sides

oh.........thanx a lot.........will try it out now............

 

[clicknext]

Originally posted by: dighn

Originally posted by: carrotunderscorecarrot
capture 4 bunkers with your rebels.

oh you actually have to research capture with your barracks, then use the "capture" command on the troops to capture the bunkers




i played all 3 sides

YAH! Good game... too short, just like most good games.

 

[ReiAyanami]

not to mention no storyline whatsoever

none of the successive missions were even related to each previous.

 

[dquan97]

I really like this game, btw...even more so than Starcraft

 

[DannyLove]

I stopped playing this game. after I finished the China 7th mission campaign. 7 missions only? Am i missing something? the game doesn't seem very balanced. Go play Age of Mythology, its much more interesting and better stradegy options

danny~!

 

[AvesPKS]

Here's a walkthrough.

 

[tk149]

Great graphics, no plot, minimal tech tree/units/upgrades, too short. Back to Age of Mythology for me.

 

[Cuda1447]

It runs horrible on my machine. I wouldn't think it would either since I have a midline rig right now. 1.7ghz P4 with a 64 MB Radeon VE and 256 mb Rambus. I dont know if its my vid card or ram but I can barely run the game. Thats why I don't play it.

 

[SendTrash]

Originally posted by: Cuda1447
It runs horrible on my machine. I wouldn't think it would either since I have a midline rig right now. 1.7ghz P4 with a 64 MB Radeon VE and 256 mb Rambus. I dont know if its my vid card or ram but I can barely run the game. Thats why I don't play it.

Really? I run at 1152 with medium detail and it runs fine with me, excep for some slow down. I am running a 2000xp+ with 512 DDR, Radeon 7500 32 megs... what resolution are you running?

 

[Cuda1447]

Originally posted by: SendTrash

Originally posted by: Cuda1447
It runs horrible on my machine. I wouldn't think it would either since I have a midline rig right now. 1.7ghz P4 with a 64 MB Radeon VE and 256 mb Rambus. I dont know if its my vid card or ram but I can barely run the game. Thats why I don't play it.

Really? I run at 1152 with medium detail and it runs fine with me, excep for some slow down. I am running a 2000xp+ with 512 DDR, Radeon 7500 32 megs... what resolution are you running?

800x600 Turn the details pretty low too. I fear it might be my Vid card?

 

[StageLeft]

I have a Celeron 1000 with 512 ram, gf 3 ti 200 overclocked and the game runs fine at 1024x768. Yes it could be faster, but for single play it's fine except in the rare occasions of perhaps a lot of CPU troops moving and screwing up their pathfinding and things like that.

 

[clicknext]

Originally posted by: Cuda1447

Originally posted by: SendTrash

Originally posted by: Cuda1447
It runs horrible on my machine. I wouldn't think it would either since I have a midline rig right now. 1.7ghz P4 with a 64 MB Radeon VE and 256 mb Rambus. I dont know if its my vid card or ram but I can barely run the game. Thats why I don't play it.

Really? I run at 1152 with medium detail and it runs fine with me, excep for some slow down. I am running a 2000xp+ with 512 DDR, Radeon 7500 32 megs... what resolution are you running?

800x600 Turn the details pretty low too. I fear it might be my Vid card?

Yeah, pretty big difference between RadeonVE and 7500. I think a better video card like the 8500 should give you good performance.

 

[777php]

I was so frustrated at the performance on my machine that I just gave up.

On many occassions I had troops/tanks/etc... heading over to a battle and they would get picked off by the enemy. I found it difficult to manage my troops as they would go too slowly from one place to another.

BTW I was running a P4 1.8 w/ 512 PC 2700 and a Radeon 8500DV.

 

[fatbaby]

it runs fine with my p4 2.0, 640mb pc2100 ddr, and gf3 ti200. But when i constructed 12 scud storms and launched them simultaneously, my framerate dropped from 70 to about 3

 

[clicknext]

Originally posted by: 777php
I was so frustrated at the performance on my machine that I just gave up.

On many occassions I had troops/tanks/etc... heading over to a battle and they would get picked off by the enemy. I found it difficult to manage my troops as they would go too slowly from one place to another.

BTW I was running a P4 1.8 w/ 512 PC 2700 and a Radeon 8500DV.

Seems like it should run fine on that... I had the same as that except an 8500LE, and a 1.6ghz AthlonXP, and it remained at a good frame rate at all times. Not great frame rate, but perfectly playable and no big slowdowns.