- Feb 7, 2009
- 9
- 0
- 0
I recently decided to replace my budget-priced Olevia 27" TV and purchase a legitimate monitor for my computer. A small upgrade doesn't make much sense to me here since a new monitor should last me 5+ years. I am particularly fond of the 30" LG W3000H model and expect to put in an order very soon.
Since I do a decent amount of gaming and play some first-person shooters, I take it I will need a medium to high end video set-up to get decent framerate on the LG at native resolution. This is my key question: just how much computing power is needed to support gaming on that kind of monitor? Running the 30" at less than native seems silly--why not get a smaller monitor in that case and upgrade later?
Anyway, here is my current rig:
E2180 OCed to 2.75Ghz
X1900XT
Gigabyte P35-DS3R MB with just one PCI-E slot
4x1GB DDR2-800 PC2 6400 GSkill
OCZ 650W Power supply
2xWD Caviar 250GB
CPU, Graphics, HD, and Northbridge are Water cooled
The furthest I could upgrade the GPU without needing to spring $100 for a new water block is to a 9800GT or a 4830. My concern is that games like Dead Space and Project Origin might not run too well on the new monitor and one of those GPUs. Native resolution with med to max options would be great--I don't need everything maxed.
The other hardware components look viable to me for now, possibly with the exception of the CPU. There I could go for something like an E8400 and OC with good results without having to replace the MB.
While I am not tight here on budget the money isn't burning a hole in my pocket either. I want to be confident that I can play games native on the monitor with med to high settings (with some longevity for components if I upgrade them) and will pay more if necessary to achieve this.
So I'm fishing for your comments on what you would do in my situation:
Just monitor and video? A 9800GT/4830 or something better?
Monitor, video, CPU? OCed E8400 or better?
Monitor, video, CPU, MB? Go for a dual PCI-E and two GPUs?
Another option?
I appreciate your views!
Since I do a decent amount of gaming and play some first-person shooters, I take it I will need a medium to high end video set-up to get decent framerate on the LG at native resolution. This is my key question: just how much computing power is needed to support gaming on that kind of monitor? Running the 30" at less than native seems silly--why not get a smaller monitor in that case and upgrade later?
Anyway, here is my current rig:
E2180 OCed to 2.75Ghz
X1900XT
Gigabyte P35-DS3R MB with just one PCI-E slot
4x1GB DDR2-800 PC2 6400 GSkill
OCZ 650W Power supply
2xWD Caviar 250GB
CPU, Graphics, HD, and Northbridge are Water cooled
The furthest I could upgrade the GPU without needing to spring $100 for a new water block is to a 9800GT or a 4830. My concern is that games like Dead Space and Project Origin might not run too well on the new monitor and one of those GPUs. Native resolution with med to max options would be great--I don't need everything maxed.
The other hardware components look viable to me for now, possibly with the exception of the CPU. There I could go for something like an E8400 and OC with good results without having to replace the MB.
While I am not tight here on budget the money isn't burning a hole in my pocket either. I want to be confident that I can play games native on the monitor with med to high settings (with some longevity for components if I upgrade them) and will pay more if necessary to achieve this.
So I'm fishing for your comments on what you would do in my situation:
Just monitor and video? A 9800GT/4830 or something better?
Monitor, video, CPU? OCed E8400 or better?
Monitor, video, CPU, MB? Go for a dual PCI-E and two GPUs?
Another option?
I appreciate your views!