Well, another reason why I oppose this new immigration bill...and yea, call me xenophobe, but if they have the indecency to pass this "destruction of america as we used to know it" bill, then they should have the "decency" to at least pay the illegal peons their own legal services. But of course not; we already pay their health insurance, their welfare and well, legal services shouldn't be a big deal...oh yea....let's fight terrorism by first getting rid of the politicians that came up with this lovely bill...
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20070522/pl_usnw/nlpc_says_immigration_bill_would_make_taxpayers_pay_legal_bills_of_illegal_aliens_seeking_amnesty">The authorizing language states: Section 504(a)(11) of Public Law 104-134 (110 Stat. 1321 et seq.) shall
not be construed to prevent a recipient of funds under the Legal Services
Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 2996 et seq.) from providing legal assistance
directly related to an application for a Z-A visa under subsection (b) or
an adjustment of status under subsection (j).
This negates a provision approved by Congress in 1996, with NLPC's input, that prevents LSC-funded lawyers from representing illegal aliens. The restriction was necessary because legal services lawyers have a long history of promoting illegal immigration and showing contempt for the ban on representing illegals.</a>
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20070522/pl_usnw/nlpc_says_immigration_bill_would_make_taxpayers_pay_legal_bills_of_illegal_aliens_seeking_amnesty">The authorizing language states: Section 504(a)(11) of Public Law 104-134 (110 Stat. 1321 et seq.) shall
not be construed to prevent a recipient of funds under the Legal Services
Corporation Act (42 U.S.C. 2996 et seq.) from providing legal assistance
directly related to an application for a Z-A visa under subsection (b) or
an adjustment of status under subsection (j).
This negates a provision approved by Congress in 1996, with NLPC's input, that prevents LSC-funded lawyers from representing illegal aliens. The restriction was necessary because legal services lawyers have a long history of promoting illegal immigration and showing contempt for the ban on representing illegals.</a>