I'm watching "Extramarital" starring the magnificent

[welst10]

Not a porn, just one of "normal" movies she've done after her porn career. Too bad almost all her porn movies are banned. Anyone saw them before they're banned?

 

[Kadarin]

When I was in high school, a friend who worked at a video store copied her movie "Pleasure Party".. I didn't think she was all that, at least not in that movie. She had a most annoying sound that she made; I could only describe it as a squeal.

 

[DAGTA]

banned? Why banned?

 

[coolred]

Cause she was only like 15 or 16 when she made them

 

[JoeKing]

I think she was underaged?

 

[Feldenak]

Originally posted by: welst10
Not a porn, just one of "normal" movies she've done after her porn career. Too bad almost all her porn movies are banned. Anyone saw them before they're banned?

Yes.

 

[welst10]

Originally posted by: Feldenak

Originally posted by: welst10
Not a porn, just one of "normal" movies she've done after her porn career. Too bad almost all her porn movies are banned. Anyone saw them before they're banned?

Yes.

lucky bastard. I always wanted to see them since she's so famous but just couldn't.

 

[welst10]

Originally posted by: DAGTA
banned? Why banned?

only 1 of her 100 mvoies was made after her 18th birthday. That was later discovered by the goverment.

 

[Feldenak]

Originally posted by: welst10

Originally posted by: Feldenak

Originally posted by: welst10
Not a porn, just one of "normal" movies she've done after her porn career. Too bad almost all her porn movies are banned. Anyone saw them before they're banned?

Yes.

lucky bastard. I always wanted to see them since she's so famous but just couldn't.

My dad owned a video store. I remember him having to take all her movies off the shelves.

 

[Kadarin]

If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

 

[Gravity]

Um, well, um........saw them? Um....well...um......

 

[ViRGE]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

Technically, her.:Q

 

[slick230]

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

Technically, her.:Q

Ah, but if she was a willing participant, what makes it a crime other than the words in the lawbooks?

 

[ViRGE]

Originally posted by: slick230

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

Technically, her.:Q

Ah, but if she was a willing participant, what makes it a crime other than the words in the lawbooks?

Because she's under 18, therefore she is (in theory) unable to consent due to lacking the wisdom, knowledge, and maturity to make an appropriate decision.

 

[DWW]

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: slick230

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

Technically, her.:Q

Ah, but if she was a willing participant, what makes it a crime other than the words in the lawbooks?

Because she's under 18, therefore she is (in theory) unable to consent due to lacking the wisdom, knowledge, and maturity to make an appropriate decision.

I'm by no means advocating watching her (whoever she is?) but I find that funny considering most people you know get laid during grade 9 or 10 in high school anyhow.

 

[imported_Aelius]

Originally posted by: DWW

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: slick230

Originally posted by: ViRGE

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

Technically, her.:Q

Ah, but if she was a willing participant, what makes it a crime other than the words in the lawbooks?

Because she's under 18, therefore she is (in theory) unable to consent due to lacking the wisdom, knowledge, and maturity to make an appropriate decision.

I'm by no means advocating watching her (whoever she is?) but I find that funny considering most people you know get laid during grade 9 or 10 in high school anyhow.

And that my friends is the hypocrisy of the law.

Just because a law exists does not automatically mean that it makes any sense. That's why citizens were granted Jury Nulification. It is the only power given to you as a citizen to checkmate a government passing laws which are deemed wrong by the citizens they are supposed to protect. It gives you the power to say the person is guilty but the law is wrong and hence must be freed and the law abolished.

It gives nightmares to Judges and the prosecution when a jury knows what it is. That's why you got jury screening. To make sure only ignorant people sit on a jury. Sad but true. You can guess what happens when one slips by them.

In this case the individual has the right to decide if what they are doing is agreeable to them. No one raped this girl on screen just because she wasn't 18. If 13 and 14 year olds can be tried as adults then perhaps 13 and 14 year olds are old enough to decide for themselves what they want out of life and government shouldn't be sticking its nose into it. The individual is responsible for themselves, be it right or wrong, they bear the consequences of their actions.

 

[Sid59]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
If there was a crime committed, who was the victim?

it would child pornography. people who owned the video would have committed a crime.

 

[dr150]

She deserves her rep as a porn star.

If you've ever seen her videos, she outright convinces you that she'd be GREAT, GREAT lay. That girl can fVck!!