- Jan 16, 2001
- 31,528
- 3
- 76
I knew I wasn't nuts. I knew my system hadn't suddenly "farted & died".
After much dissapointment/consternation with those POS NVidia 10.80's, I downloaded the 7.52. I know they just came out with the 7.56, I downloaded that, but when installing, you have to pick from an "option list" that lists thing's I've never seen before. I tried two or three different ones, the driver loaded, but performance was almost as bad as the 10.80....that's freaking pitiful. :frown:
Anyway, the 7.52 is supposed to be the sh*t, right? Right. So, downloaded it, set desktop to 1164 x 8(I forget, it's early, but you know what I mean) 32bit color, 100Hz refresh. Just like I had before with the good 'ol 6.31's.
Run 3DMark...down 200 points from the 6.31's. WTF? Run UT timedemo...only 55 FPS as opposed to 82FPS w/6.31s. More WTF.
So, on a whim and a hunch, I reset my desktop to the same res that I game at 1024 x 768 x 32. 3Dmark was only down by around 100, but FPS went up to 100FPS with UT! Yeah baby! 100FPS 1024 x 768 x 32! I was in frag heaven. I ran it twice to ensure it wasn't a fluke.
What can we determine by all this? We can determine, conclusively, that Desktop resolution is directly related to how high you benchmark and how good (FPS) your gaming performance is.
I'll be keeping the 7.52s. My 3DMark score is down to around 7300 (which is still a far cry from the 2300 I used to get with my old card) but my FPS in UT is up by around 10%.
I'm sure I'll hear from lots of folks on this, telling me to stop listening to the voices in my head...but you guys are just jealous that the voices only talk to me! Fire away! Have a great weekend.
After much dissapointment/consternation with those POS NVidia 10.80's, I downloaded the 7.52. I know they just came out with the 7.56, I downloaded that, but when installing, you have to pick from an "option list" that lists thing's I've never seen before. I tried two or three different ones, the driver loaded, but performance was almost as bad as the 10.80....that's freaking pitiful. :frown:
Anyway, the 7.52 is supposed to be the sh*t, right? Right. So, downloaded it, set desktop to 1164 x 8(I forget, it's early, but you know what I mean) 32bit color, 100Hz refresh. Just like I had before with the good 'ol 6.31's.
Run 3DMark...down 200 points from the 6.31's. WTF? Run UT timedemo...only 55 FPS as opposed to 82FPS w/6.31s. More WTF.
So, on a whim and a hunch, I reset my desktop to the same res that I game at 1024 x 768 x 32. 3Dmark was only down by around 100, but FPS went up to 100FPS with UT! Yeah baby! 100FPS 1024 x 768 x 32! I was in frag heaven. I ran it twice to ensure it wasn't a fluke.
What can we determine by all this? We can determine, conclusively, that Desktop resolution is directly related to how high you benchmark and how good (FPS) your gaming performance is.
I'll be keeping the 7.52s. My 3DMark score is down to around 7300 (which is still a far cry from the 2300 I used to get with my old card) but my FPS in UT is up by around 10%.
I'm sure I'll hear from lots of folks on this, telling me to stop listening to the voices in my head...but you guys are just jealous that the voices only talk to me! Fire away! Have a great weekend.