I'm going to start saying Twenty Oh Three instead of Two Thousand Three

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
It's more "futuristic" to say Twenty Oh Three. No one in Star Trek says Two Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Four. And no one ever said "Nineteen hundred ninety three", so it's more inline with what we're used to saying anyway.
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
That's fantastic!
rolleye.gif
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
It's more "futuristic" to say Twenty Oh Three. No one in Star Trek says Two Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Four. And no one ever said "Nineteen hundred ninety three", so it's more inline with what we're used to saying anyway.

Wearing tinfoil jumpsuits is also more futuristic.
 

Migroo

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2001
4,488
9
81
Actually the correct English is:

Two Thousand and Three.

All you Americans are forgetting the 'and'! :D
 

illusion88

Lifer
Oct 2, 2001
13,164
3
81
Originally posted by: Corn
It's more "futuristic" to say Twenty Oh Three. No one in Star Trek says Two Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Four. And no one ever said "Nineteen hundred ninety three", so it's more inline with what we're used to saying anyway.

Wearing tinfoil jumpsuits is also more futuristic.

im down with that
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: Migroo
Actually the correct English is:

Two Thousand and Three.

All you Americans are forgetting the 'and'! :D

But nobody ever said "Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Four! I'm just trying to be consistent.
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
Originally posted by: Migroo
Actually the correct English is:

Two Thousand and Three.

All you Americans are forgetting the 'and'! :D

Actually, it's Two Thousand Three. The 'and' only comes into play when dealing with a fraction or decimal. Like Two Thousand Fourteen and Five Sixteenths.
 

bigredguy

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2001
2,457
0
0
Originally posted by: Migroo
Actually the correct English is:

Two Thousand and Three.

All you Americans are forgetting the 'and'! :D

Actually saying 'and' in a number sequence designates a decimal. Two Thousand and Three = 2000.3

 

Kyteland

Diamond Member
Dec 30, 2002
5,747
1
81
Originally posted by: Migroo
Actually the correct English is:

Two Thousand and Three.

All you Americans are forgetting the 'and'! :D

No, Two Thousand Three is proper. the use of an 'and' signifies a fraction. If you write a check (or is ir cheque for you?) you do not put an 'and' between any of the actual numbers. You put it between the dollars and the cents.

EDIT: Sigh. Too slow again.
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: Migroo
Actually the correct English is:

Two Thousand and Three.

All you Americans are forgetting the 'and'! :D

Actually, it's Two Thousand Three. The 'and' only comes into play when dealing with a fraction or decimal. Like Two Thousand Fourteen and Five Sixteenths.

Yep.

For instance..

107 = One Hundred Seven not One Hundred and Seven.

:)
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
Originally posted by: Triumph
It's more "futuristic" to say Twenty Oh Three. No one in Star Trek says Two Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Four. And no one ever said "Nineteen hundred ninety three", so it's more inline with what we're used to saying anyway.

actually, some did say nineteen hundred . . . , what they didn't say and more appropriate for your example is they never said year one thousand nine hundred . . .
 

ohtwell

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
14,516
9
81
You could always include the use of "stardate"! :D

Today is Stardate 021703. :p


: ) Amanda