As I said a few post ago, The reason gay men have a higher chance of STDs is because many believe that they don't need a condom because there is no chance of either of them getting pregnant, it has nothing to do with them having sex with other males.
Condoms are made for 2 reasons, protection from pregnancy and protection from STDs.
Another example, men who either had a vasectomy or testicular cancer have a much higher chance of having a STD, the reason for this is because many of these men believe they do not need a condom because they cannot impregnate a woman which makes it more likely for them to catch a STD. Its the same thing with gay men.
(facepalm)
The red herring is you trying to pass off men having sex with men as harmless. Your reasoning why gays are thinking they don't need condoms is equal to saying smokers have no idea about lung cancer.
So if gays wore condoms sex would be safer... yeah great. And if worms had guns, birds wouldn't eat them. Both are not happening. You are totally passing over reality - what is actually happening, and the fact is, that is leading a homosexual lifestyle is WAY more prone to disease. Here is a good summary:
Men having sex with other men leads to greater health risks than men having sex with women19 not only because of promiscuity but also because of the nature of sex among men. A British researcher summarizes the danger as follows:
"Male homosexual behaviour is not simply either 'active' or 'passive,' since penile-anal, mouth-penile, and hand-anal sexual contact is usual for both partners, and mouth-anal contact is not infrequent. . . . Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence of diseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma may encourage the entry of micro-organisms and thus lead to primary syphilitic lesions occurring in the anogenital area. . . . In addition to sodomy, trauma may be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile adornments, and prostheses."20
Although the specific activities addressed below may be practiced by heterosexuals at times, homosexual men engage in these activities to a far greater extent.21
Anal intercourse is the sine qua non of sex for many gay men.22 Yet human physiology makes it clear that the body was not designed to accommodate this activity. The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In comparison, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic.
The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.
In summary: Dicks don't belong in your ass, nothing does. You cannot throw a condom at this problem and pass it off as normal behavior.
Facebook
Twitter