- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
You have one side who claims it's all about people coming here illegally, with calls to wall off the Mexico border and round up/deport all those undocumented who are here already. On the other hand you have people claiming the better good is to leave families intact and with a lottery mentality that once you're here, they've "won" and should be left alone.
Unspoken in the background is the obvious - if millions are migrating here illegally, maybe perhaps the immigration quotas are a bit off? In economics, you have the concept of an equilbrium curve where value is maximized on both axises, you would think that there'd be a point at which legal immigration would be a more economical choice for those wanting to come here.
From the Mexican point of view it would add a degree of certainty - sure, it might take a couple of years waiting in queue, but once you were allowed in, it would be with papers and without fear of Immigration coming to deport you.
From the American point of view, you already weren't stopping Mexicans getting in, so what difference does it make if the quota is raised from 1 million a year to 3 million (these are made up numbers).
Of course, my own hunch is that the stated reasons of the partisans on both sides are far more ugly than they'd like to admit. I'd wager to bet that most of the Minutemen and those wanting to build a fence along the Rio Grande are just using legal status as a fig leaf, they just don't like Mexicans coming here period. And those who immigrate illegally don't give a rats ass about trying to do things the legal way and resent the law for limiting them in the first place.
Unspoken in the background is the obvious - if millions are migrating here illegally, maybe perhaps the immigration quotas are a bit off? In economics, you have the concept of an equilbrium curve where value is maximized on both axises, you would think that there'd be a point at which legal immigration would be a more economical choice for those wanting to come here.
From the Mexican point of view it would add a degree of certainty - sure, it might take a couple of years waiting in queue, but once you were allowed in, it would be with papers and without fear of Immigration coming to deport you.
From the American point of view, you already weren't stopping Mexicans getting in, so what difference does it make if the quota is raised from 1 million a year to 3 million (these are made up numbers).
Of course, my own hunch is that the stated reasons of the partisans on both sides are far more ugly than they'd like to admit. I'd wager to bet that most of the Minutemen and those wanting to build a fence along the Rio Grande are just using legal status as a fig leaf, they just don't like Mexicans coming here period. And those who immigrate illegally don't give a rats ass about trying to do things the legal way and resent the law for limiting them in the first place.