Actually, those of you who are calling the bidders idiots are more idiotic themselves.
If we were arguing the semantics behind all advertisements, everyone would perceivably be deceitful. The fact is, this guy said, "with receipt." Why in the hell would he put that if he didn't want to purposely be deceitful? Why would someone out to purchase a PS2 box want the damn receipt?
Point is, yes, the bidder was probably a little too liberal in his/her bidding, but the auctioner was purposely misleading the bidders by leaving out punctuation that changes the semantics enough to cause question, but then follows up with "and receipt" to essentially remove the doubt out of most peoples' minds.
I wouldn't have fallen for it, but still... don't be a hypocrite and call everyone an idiot
[edit]Doh! Soybomb made my point before I posted...[/edit]