Originally posted by: JS80
What's the difference of aborting him after he is born?
Originally posted by: Sam334
Originally posted by: JS80
What's the difference of aborting him after he is born?
25 to life.
Originally posted by: Sam334
Originally posted by: JS80
What's the difference of aborting him after he is born?
25 to life.
Originally posted by: BillGates
I would definitely strongly consider it... Sad decision to make but man...
Originally posted by: tweakmm
I really don't know. I'd be leaning strongly towards yes, but damn.
This is a bridge that I'll have to cross when it comes up.
Originally posted by: BillGates
I would definitely strongly consider it... Sad decision to make but man...
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
No.
IMO, aborting a baby because you don't want a retard for a child is really, really selfish.
Originally posted by: BrianH1
Originally posted by: tweakmm
I really don't know. I'd be leaning strongly towards yes, but damn.
This is a bridge that I'll have to cross when it comes up.
agreed
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
What if the child had a debilitating disease? Chronic illness? Physical deformities? Are we to say who's good enough to live and who doesn't deserve life and should die? "I don't like this one... it has a disease. It'll cost me too much time and money. Let's kill it and try again." Are those free from defects the only ones who should live?
Originally posted by: miniMUNCH
No.
IMO, aborting a baby because you don't want a retard for a child is really, really selfish.
Originally posted by: newParadigm
why abort, you could offer him/her up for adoption...this being said, my cousin had a baby with Downs Syndrome, sometimes the parents don't find out until 6-7 months in, and an abortion at that stage is just sick in my opinion. Adoption is the best way to go if you cant handle it.
~new
(They didn't offer for adoption, and the baby turned out to only have a slight case of Downs, and has developed more normally than one would think)