How so?Originally posted by: sniperruff
seriously, religions aren't meant to be proven anyway. proofs are for science, which in itself a kind of religion.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
How so?Originally posted by: sniperruff
seriously, religions aren't meant to be proven anyway. proofs are for science, which in itself a kind of religion.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
How so?Originally posted by: sniperruff
seriously, religions aren't meant to be proven anyway. proofs are for science, which in itself a kind of religion.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
I think the title of this thread is incorrect. What you meant to say was "If you had irrefutable proof that Jesus was not the son of god, what would you do with it?"
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
nothing. faith is synonymous with ignorance.
truth is relative. do you honestly think christians would honestly drop their belief and cease to exist?
this applies to all religions, not christianity in particular.
Originally posted by: shimsham
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
nothing. faith is synonymous with ignorance.
truth is relative. do you honestly think christians would honestly drop their belief and cease to exist?
this applies to all religions, not christianity in particular.
life is synonymous with ignorance. its impossible to know all things all the time.
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Originally posted by: shimsham
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
nothing. faith is synonymous with ignorance.
truth is relative. do you honestly think christians would honestly drop their belief and cease to exist?
this applies to all religions, not christianity in particular.
life is synonymous with ignorance. its impossible to know all things all the time.
what is your point?
Originally posted by: TBone48
Originally posted by: Excelsior
I think the title of this thread is incorrect. What you meant to say was "If you had irrefutable proof that Jesus was not the son of god, what would you do with it?"
Based on this revision, I would go public with it. I hate deception. Although, what would count as "irrefutable" evidence?