- May 31, 2001
- 10,027
- 1
- 81
Originally posted by: HumblePie
Stupid myths. Yes, by techincal definition it's incest. However, a smaller gene pool doesn't automatically mean spontaneous DNA mutations, chromosomal mishaps, babies with two heads or missing arms, or whatever other stupid story you may have heard.Originally posted by: Hyperblaze
Originally posted by: davew0670
it depends...do I still get to bang my sister?
okay, that's just downright sick.
You know that's incest right?
All a smaller gene pool does is make a small problem possibly into a bigger problem with recessive genes. Many people have recessive genes that, if pair with other recessive or lack of the dominate gene, could cause mental or physical defects. In a spread out gene pool, this keeps that gene recessive or has a possibility of not being passed on at all. In a small gene pool, that isn't always the case as when you pair up 2 people with recessives, there is a chance to knock out the dominate and which leads tot he recessive taking over. Such things happened with Royalty back in the day and some Jewish and Omish communities as well. Sorry, just out to dispell more myths.
you also forgot it was downright discusting and against the law
