If you don't return the book, we'll charge you with child porn

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
KaOTiK

KaOTiK

Lifer
Feb 5, 2001
10,877
8
81
So they want to charge any student that doesn't want to bring it back with child porn, but is it really child porn when they are your same age? lol
Also, they are teens, not children anymore, why has this country become so nuts with how to deal with nudity/sex now.

I remember back in highschool a couple got caught with the girl giving head to the dude. The teacher who caught them simply gave them detention for a week and this was only the in late 90s. Now they would be arrested and probably expelled from school.
 
Last edited:
Kadarin

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
15
81
paulney said:
“As much as we know teenagers are and will be teenagers, by law we cannot ignore it,” MacKay said.
Click to expand...

This guy needs to be shot in the face.

I also agree that if they threatened the students with possession of childporn over this, then they've classified the pic as childporn. So they SHOULD charge everyone involved in publishing and selling that pic for production of childporn. But they're not going to do it, because they're jackasses who deserve to be shot in the face for being so fucking stupid.
 
khon

khon

Golden Member
Jun 8, 2010
1,318
124
106
This is idiotic.

It's probably embarrasing for the girl, and if it had been caught before the yearbooks were sent out, I could understand trying to fix it. But there is no way this is childporn, and in any case a lot of people will have scanned/photographed the yearbook anyway, so there is no way to remove the picture from circulation.

It happened, just deal with it, and lets move on with our lives.
 
OutHouse

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
KaOTiK said:
So they want to charge any student that doesn't want to bring it back with child porn, but is it really child porn when they are your same age? lol
Also, they are teens, not children anymore, why has this country become so nuts with how to deal with nudity/sex now.

I remember back in highschool a couple got caught with the girl giving head to the dude. The teacher who caught them simply gave them detention for a week and this was only the in late 90s. Now they would be arrested and probably expelled from school.
Click to expand...

Pictures of minors engaged in a sex act is child porn. Whats so hard to understand about that.
 
Murloc

Murloc

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2008
5,382
65
91
they're both minors.
the pic was not taken on purpose.
Complain and get the pic deleted from the yearbook, done.

Where's the crime?
 
edro

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
Threaten anyone with child porn or pedophilia and you get exactly what you want.
This country makes me sad.
 
sourceninja

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
Hey! You know what is good for the children of this country? Getting them charged with a sex crime, especially one involving minors. That will make sure they have a long and prosperous career in any industry.

We all know people with these kind of crimes on their record can live anywhere, have total privacy, and can work any kind of job.
 
Wyndru

Wyndru

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2009
7,318
4
76
fixxor said:
I heard this on the radio this morning. My first thought was how did the high school staff allow that picture. And then they said they were going to charge people who did not return the books. This country is screwed... D:
Click to expand...

In the high school I work at, the yearbook committee is made up of 6 students. They basically run around, take pics and upload them to a web based publisher.

There is an advisor (one of our math teachers) that scans through the yearbook before it is finalized. I doubt she looks closely at all of the pictures. It's more to check that columns are aligned properly and it looks good. It would be easy in our school for something like this to happen.
 
Newbian

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,767
859
126
OutHouse said:
Pictures of minors engaged in a sex act is child porn. Whats so hard to understand about that.
Click to expand...

The part where there is no porn or sex act in progress, all it was is a picture of a kid with a hand down another persons pants.
 
A

actuarial

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2009
2,814
0
71
silverpig said:
Someone should charge the school with producing and selling child porn then. And seeking it in the recall.
Click to expand...

As pissed off as I'd be as the father of that girl (ya know, finger banging my daughter in public), I think I'd actually feel bad for the kid being hung out to dry over something meaningless.

The girl's family should sue the school for distributing pornographic images of her, causing her deep emotional distress, and then use the money to fund the other kid's defense.

Edit: And how can he prove penetration? He can't even prove he was rubbing. He can only prove touching upper thigh at best.
 
Last edited:
G

GundamW

Golden Member
Feb 3, 2000
1,440
0
0
Newbian said:
The part where there is no porn or sex act in progress, all it was is a picture of a kid with a hand down another persons pants.
Click to expand...

Yea. This is the part I don't get. There is no sex act and no nudity. Just picture of a kid with a hand down another's pants and it's somehow an "implied" sex act with two minors.

If that's the case, wouldn't a lot of magazines/books/tv shows/movies be classified as porn?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom